2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.1936.tb00081.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die Gedächtnisleistungen der Vögel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hiding the reward in a container is problematic for animals without object permanence (Heubel, 1939). Even if they have it they likely perform better if they see the reward directly (Fischel, 1936).…”
Section: Object Permanencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hiding the reward in a container is problematic for animals without object permanence (Heubel, 1939). Even if they have it they likely perform better if they see the reward directly (Fischel, 1936).…”
Section: Object Permanencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some animals lack an understanding of object permanence (see Table 2) and might use for example, olfactory cues to solve the task (Bierens de Haan, 1932; Heubel, 1939). Even for animals with an understanding of object permanence who have learned to associate a particular container with food, motivation appears to be higher when they can observe the food (Fischel, 1936; Medina, 2012).…”
Section: Common Cognitive Investigations With Different String Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first studies to systematically investigate stringpulling in parrots was an experiment conducted with four naïve African grey parrots by Irene Pepperberg (2004), to whom this special issue is dedicated (see Fischel, 1936;Funk, 2002;Rensch & Dücker, 1977, for other early studies). In her study, Pepperberg (2004) found that while language-naïve individuals would spontaneously perform the steps necessary for coordinated pulling, two language-trained grey parrots vocally requested the reward from the human experimenter, which was suggested as possibly representing a form of understanding of certain task properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%