2021
DOI: 10.1515/9783839457856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die Evolution der Religion

Abstract: Nachdem der Evolutionismus in der Religionsforschung um 1900 Konjunktur hatte, sind im Verlauf des 20. Jahrhunderts seine Fehler ans Licht gekommen und es ist um das Thema der religiösen Evolution eher ruhig geworden. Seit den letzten 25 Jahren nimmt sich die Forschung des Themas erneut an -innerhalb der Religionsgeschichte, aber auch in kognitions-und sozialwissenschaftlicher Perspektive. Die Reihe »Religiöse Evolution« (RE) versteht sich als Plattform für Arbeiten im Zusammenhang von disziplinübergreifenden … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 85 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be sufficient to argue that religion is understood in this article in terms of systems theory as a functionally differentiated subsystem of society that consists of communications. These communications are identifiable as religious if they use the guiding difference immanent/transcendent while dealing with ultimate contingency (Krech 2012(Krech , 2021. Relating this approach to material objects, it becomes clear that they are always polysemous, that is, they do not have a fixed meaning, for example, as "religious" or "non-religious," and that they must always be considered in the context of their immediate communicative context.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be sufficient to argue that religion is understood in this article in terms of systems theory as a functionally differentiated subsystem of society that consists of communications. These communications are identifiable as religious if they use the guiding difference immanent/transcendent while dealing with ultimate contingency (Krech 2012(Krech , 2021. Relating this approach to material objects, it becomes clear that they are always polysemous, that is, they do not have a fixed meaning, for example, as "religious" or "non-religious," and that they must always be considered in the context of their immediate communicative context.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%