Die Europäisierung des deutschen Wirtschaftssystems

Hartwich, Hans-Hermann

doi:10.1007/978-3-322-93344-7

Cited by 33 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Employment policy is largely perceived as the responsibility of the social partners within a publicly regulated framework (c.f. Hartwich 1998;Huber and Stephens 2001;Kersbergen 1995: 174-191). Although similar our categories and variables are not identical with the approach developed by Esping-Andersen (1990).…”

Section: Theoretical and Methodological Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

What Do Parties Want? An Analysis of Programmatic Social Policy AIMS in Austria, Germany and the Netherlands

Seeleib-Kaiser

Dyk²,

Roggenkamp³

2005

European Journal of Social Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparative welfare state research has argued for some time that whether Social Democrats or Christian Democrats are in government makes a difference with regard to specific welfare state design. The theory is based on the fact that, historically, the social policy aims of Social Democrats and Christian Democrats have differed. Can these policy differences still be assumed after almost three decades, which have been characterised by a discourse about ‘necessary’ welfare state retrenchment, adaptation, and modification? Based on an in-depth analysis of the social policy aims of the Social Democrats and Christian Democrats in Austria, Germany, and the Netherlands since 1975, we argue that, the differences between the two welfare state parties in formerly conservative welfare states have largely faded away.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical and Methodological Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%