1924
DOI: 10.1007/bf01813381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die Encephalitis periaxialis diffusa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1926
1926
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cases of “diffuse sclerosis” that resemble X-ALD were also described in 1899 by Ceni [11] and in 1910 by Haberfield and Spieler [12]. Shortly thereafter Schilder suggested that “diffuse sclerosis” was too vague and proposed a more accurate pathological classification of the leukodystrophies [13-15]. He described several cases with lesions in the cerebral white matter and perivascular inflammation that he named “encephalitis periaxialis diffusa”.…”
Section: Clinical Features Of X-aldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cases of “diffuse sclerosis” that resemble X-ALD were also described in 1899 by Ceni [11] and in 1910 by Haberfield and Spieler [12]. Shortly thereafter Schilder suggested that “diffuse sclerosis” was too vague and proposed a more accurate pathological classification of the leukodystrophies [13-15]. He described several cases with lesions in the cerebral white matter and perivascular inflammation that he named “encephalitis periaxialis diffusa”.…”
Section: Clinical Features Of X-aldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case ultimately would be described as the MDS variant of Schilder's disease. Eventually, however, many other demyelinating and even dysmyelinating diseases became loosely defined as varieties of Schilder's diffuse sclerosis [2], Schilder [5,6] himself fur ther confused the issue by later describing 2 additional cases in 1913 and 1924 which in fact were separate disor ders, ALD and subacute sclerosing panencephalitis. The confusion surrounding the many disorders was adressed by Poser and Van Bogeart [7] when they reviewed the his torical case reports and correctly diagnosed the specific disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readers interested in the history of neurology may appreciate to learn that Poser and Bogaert, in their seminal 1956 article on MDS (in which they pointed out that the cases described by Schilder in 1913 [46] and 1924 [47] rather represented instances of leukodystrophy and subacute sclerosing encephalitis) classified Devic’s NMO as a variant of Schilder’s MDS [48], thereby further contributing to nosological confusion. The only patient with MDS so far tested for serum AQP4-IgG, a highly specific marker of NMO, was negative for that marker [23] (a second patient was negative for CSF AQP4-IgG [49]; however, CSF is not the specimen of choice when it comes to testing for AQP4-IgG [50]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%