Bodenkundliches Praktikum 1927
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-91972-5_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die Bestimmung des spezifischen Gewichtes des Bodens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1943
1943
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A parallel series was run in which the plants derived their phosphate from weighed amounts of soil from the different treatments, the weight of sand + soil in each pot being kept constant at 15 lb. Apart from differences in the soil: sand ratio, the experimental technique was essentially that described by Mitscherlich (1930), and yield data for straw + grain were obtained from the triplicate determinations.…”
Section: Modified Mitscherlich Method a Series Of Potmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A parallel series was run in which the plants derived their phosphate from weighed amounts of soil from the different treatments, the weight of sand + soil in each pot being kept constant at 15 lb. Apart from differences in the soil: sand ratio, the experimental technique was essentially that described by Mitscherlich (1930), and yield data for straw + grain were obtained from the triplicate determinations.…”
Section: Modified Mitscherlich Method a Series Of Potmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where 1' = yield, A = maximal dry matter yield, b = 'dn intercept parameter for yield, N = applied N rate and c -the N response coefficient. This model is easily recognized as a simplified version of a general fanh (AO model (Hotellmg 1927, cited by Richards 1969), Mitscherlich (1930 developed a similar version much earlier for application to soil fertility studies without acknowledging any relationship to the tanh(AO function. The simplified tanh(AO function risks some loss of ability to meet important residual criteria for an economic analysis of the data but only at initial rates of nutrient addition.…”
Section: R^^ni+e-'-^-"^)-' (3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The priority work on the productivity functions in agricultural chemistry is the work of Liebig, 1855 [1], although so-called model of Liebig (FPL) in the linear and partially smoothed form, took the mathematical form of a linear function with a subsequent plateau later [2-6 etc.]. Beginning in 1909, the works of Mitscherlich [7] and independently from 1923 works of Spillman [8] offered a model (productivity functions of Mitscherlich-Spillman PFMS) based on the inverse exponent, which has also a plateau as productivity function of Liebig, but it has damped response within the break point. Further development of theoretical concepts of the FP was made by Baule in 1918 (multifactor model of Mitscherlich-Baule [9]), Bray since 1944 (the concept of influence of mobility of food compounds on PF [10][11][12], Von Boguslawski E., & B. Schneider, refinement of Mitscherlich model [13][14][15][16] and many other researchers [2][3][4][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the main focus is on the factor of phosphorus. Phosphorus compounds are often one of the limiting factors in plant productivity [1,7,13,33]. Their low mobility in soil determines prolonged aftereffect of phosphate fertilizers, which allows them to "store" [12,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation