Die Bedeutung der Wundererzählungen für die Christologie des Markusevangeliums

Koch, Dietrich-Alex

doi:10.1515/9783110840681

Cited by 15 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Hellenistic background that Dibelius draws on to illustrate his point includes Asklepios, Serapis, Apollonius of Tyana, and Alexander of Abonuteichus. Although this is not a fully formed and articulated theios anēr hypothesis, it stands in continuity with Reitzenstein and others to come (Wetter 1916; Weinreich 1921; Windisch 1934; Leisegang 1950; Georgi 1964; Bieler 1967; Weeden 1968, 1971; Schenke 1974; Koch 1975; Anderson 1976; Gallagher 1982). For a good discussion of sources specific to the idea Hellenism as a mediator between the theios anēr hypothesis and early Christianity (e.g.…”

Section: History Of Religions and The θεĩος ἀνήρ Debatesupporting

confidence: 62%

“…In the first case, Keck (1965), Achtemeier (1970, 1972), and Kuhn (1971) had all sought to identify pre-Markan miracle narratives used by Mark, but, as deftly noted by Dowd, each came to ‘divergent results’ (1988: 20). Furthermore, both Schenke (1974) and Koch (1975) have rigorously argued for the non-existence of pre-Markan miracle narrative cycles. Schenke, comparing miracle narratives in Mark to those in John, concludes that Mark’s narrative does not indicate a ‘sign source’ as John’s does (1974: 286).…”

Section: Miracles In Mark and The Identity Of Jesusmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Schenke, comparing miracle narratives in Mark to those in John, concludes that Mark’s narrative does not indicate a ‘sign source’ as John’s does (1974: 286). Although it is possible that some miracle narratives were circulating before Mark, it is a stretch to argue for the specific developed community suggested by Georgi (see also Koch 1975).…”

Section: Miracles In Mark and The Identity Of Jesusmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Miracles, Jesus, and Identity: A History of Research regarding Jesus and Miracles with Special Attention to the Gospel of Mark

Kelley

2014

Currents in Biblical Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To write a comprehensive history of research regarding miracle narratives and the Gospels that is also reasonably sized would itself be miraculous. This article attempts to present a history of literature that is faithful to the wealth of research about miracles and Jesus, but at the same time focuses directly on studies most relevant to the narrative of the Gospel of Mark in its final form. The development of miracle studies has multiple facets and has been approached in a variety of disparate ways. In order to facilitate the clearest history of research, the article has placed relevant works into five major categories: history of religions and the theios anēr debate; historical Jesus studies; the miracle, medicine, and magic discussion; comparative, literary, and other studies; and miracles in Mark and the identity of Jesus. Each of these categories are designed to review the history of secondary scholarship regarding Jesus, miracles, and the identity of Jesus as a miracle-worker with special attention to the Gospel of Mark.

show abstract

Section: History Of Religions and The θεĩος ἀνήρ Debatesupporting

confidence: 62%

Section: Miracles In Mark and The Identity Of Jesusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Miracles In Mark and The Identity Of Jesusmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Miracles, Jesus, and Identity: A History of Research regarding Jesus and Miracles with Special Attention to the Gospel of Mark

Kelley

2014

Currents in Biblical Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Composition of Mark 4:1–8:26

Petersen

1980

H. Theolo. Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mark 4:1–8:26 is a compositional unit whose external boundaries are determined by its internal structure. Because neither this structure nor the unit it defines has been observed previously I shall concentrate on them, dealing with other views of Mark's composition only when they are relevant to my argument. My purpose is to identify the compositional structure of Mark 4:1–8:26, and to point to some of the hermeneutical implications of the structure. The method to be followed is composition-critical to the extent that it is concerned both with the segmentation of the narrative into its constituent units and with their arrangement as a key to their significance in their Markan literary context. I acknowledge that most of these units originated in pre-Markan traditions, some of which may have been accessible to Mark in the form of collections, and that Mark's dependence upon such material determines the hermeneutical problem of his narrative. This problem can be expressed either as the question of the author's investment in his material or as the question of the literary significance of the once preliterary material. Because the answer to the former question is necessarily an inference from the answer to the latter, my orientation is to the latter, namely, to the question of the relevance of the compositional structure of Mark 4:1–8:26 for understanding the compositional significance of its parts.

show abstract

Inhaltliche Gliederung und geographischer Aufriss im Markusevangelium

Koch¹

1983

New Testam. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AUFRISS 1M MARKUSEVANGELIUMDer Versuch, eine sachgemafie Gliederung fur eine Schrift der Antike zu finden, hat nicht nur pragmatische Bedeutung, etwa um dem heutigen Leser eine Obersicht iiber den darin enthaltenen Stoff zu verschaffen. Eine moglichst prazise Gliederung kann zugleich auch eine wichtige Vorklarung iiber die inhaltliche Zielsetzung der betreffenden Schrift darstellen.' Hinsichtlich der Gliederung des Markusevangeliums (MkEv) konkurrieren in der Literatur eine Reihe unterschiedlicher Entwiirfe miteinander, die sich jedoch auf zwei klar unterscheidbare Gliederungsprinzipien zuriickfiihren lassen, auf eine rein geographische Einteilung und eine (mehroder minder) rein inhaltliche bzw. thematische. 2

show abstract

Die Bedeutung der Wundererzählungen für die Christologie des Markusevangeliums

Cited by 15 publications

References 0 publications

Miracles, Jesus, and Identity: A History of Research regarding Jesus and Miracles with Special Attention to the Gospel of Mark

Miracles, Jesus, and Identity: A History of Research regarding Jesus and Miracles with Special Attention to the Gospel of Mark

The Composition of Mark 4:1–8:26

Inhaltliche Gliederung und geographischer Aufriss im Markusevangelium

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About