“…Now we restrict our attention to the n-Engel word w x y = x n y , where n is an integer greater than 1. Although the right 2-Engel elements of a group form a subgroup [7], Macdonald has shown in [9] that there exists a finite 2-group in which the set of right 3-Engel elements is not a subgroup. The set of right n-Engel elements of a group G coincides with the intersection of all the sets W w R g = a ∈ G a n g = 1 , with g ∈ G. Then, when n ≥ 3 the set W w R g cannot be a subgroup of G in general, but property ii holds in metabelian groups.…”
Let w x y be a word in two variables and the variety determined by w. In this paper we raise the following question: if for every pair of elements a b in a group G there exists g ∈ G such that w a g b = 1, under what conditions does the group G belong to ? In particular, we consider the n-Engel word w x y = x n y . We show that in this case the property is satisfied when the group G is metabelian. If n = 2, then we extend this result to the class of all solvable groups.
“…Now we restrict our attention to the n-Engel word w x y = x n y , where n is an integer greater than 1. Although the right 2-Engel elements of a group form a subgroup [7], Macdonald has shown in [9] that there exists a finite 2-group in which the set of right 3-Engel elements is not a subgroup. The set of right n-Engel elements of a group G coincides with the intersection of all the sets W w R g = a ∈ G a n g = 1 , with g ∈ G. Then, when n ≥ 3 the set W w R g cannot be a subgroup of G in general, but property ii holds in metabelian groups.…”
Let w x y be a word in two variables and the variety determined by w. In this paper we raise the following question: if for every pair of elements a b in a group G there exists g ∈ G such that w a g b = 1, under what conditions does the group G belong to ? In particular, we consider the n-Engel word w x y = x n y . We show that in this case the property is satisfied when the group G is metabelian. If n = 2, then we extend this result to the class of all solvable groups.
“…By definition of N the centralizer C G (a) is normal in N for any element a ∈ G. Therefore a −1 a b ∈ C N (a) for any two elements a, b ∈ N . So N is a 2-Engel group (see also [3]). Now it is well known that N is a nilpotent group of class at most 3 and so it is soluble group of class at most 2.…”
For any group G, let C(G) denote the set of centralizers of G. We say that a group G has n centralizers (G is a Cn-group) if |C(G)| = n.In this note, we show that the derived length of a soluble Cn-group (not necessarily finite) is bounded by a function of n.Mathematics Subject Classification (2010). Primary 20E07; Secondary 20D10.
“…Let G be any group with a normal right 2-Engel subgroup H . In [8,9] (see also [10,Theorem 7.13 ∈ H , x, y, z ∈ G , is abelian and so [H, G, G, G] 2 = 1. Examples 1 and 2 in [6] then show that this is the best possible.…”
In this sequel to "On right n-Engel subgroups" we add a new general structure result on right n-Engel subgroups. We also use one of the structure results to prove some results about right nEngel subgroups in finite p-groups.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.