2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Didactyl Tracks of Paravian Theropods (Maniraptora) from the ?Middle Jurassic of Africa

Abstract: BackgroundA new dinosaur tracksite from ?Middle Jurassic sediments of the Irhazer Group on the plains of Agadez (Rep. Niger, northwest Africa) revealed extraordinarily well preserved didactyl tracks of a digitigrade bipedal trackmaker. The distinct morphology of the pes imprints indicates a theropod trackmaker from a paravian maniraptoran closely related to birds.Methodology/Principal FindingsThe early age and the morphological traits of the tracks allow for description of the new ichnotaxon Paravipus didactyl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we recognize the subjec− tivity inherently involved in ichnotaxonomy (owing to the subtle relationships between behaviour, substrate composi− tion, preservation, and the resultant track), we err on the side of caution in assigning the Yanguoxia tracks to Dromaeo− saripus (based on the aforementioned shared traits) rather than attempting to synonymize the preexisting species of Dromaeosauripus but erect a new ichnospecies to accommo− date the observed differences between those ichnotaxa (see following discussion). The divarication angles (mean: 19°) between digits III-IV in D. yongjingensis are greater than in Dromaeopodus (~5°; Li et al 2007), Paravipus (5-15°; Mudroch et al 2010), Dro− maeosauripus hamanensis (5-10°; Kim et al 2008), Dro− maeosauripus jinjuensis (8-14°; Kim et al 2012), and the un− named Morocco didactyl tracks (16°; Ishigaki and Lockley 2010), but less than in Velociraptorichnus (21-28°; Zhen et al 1994;Xing et al 2009) and Menglongipus (41-44°). One of the most striking differences is the digital pad formula: the x−1−3−4−x digital pad formula of D. yongjingensis differenti− ates it from other Dromaeosauripus (formula x−1−4−4−x; Kim et al 2008Kim et al , 2012, Dromaeopodus (formula x−1−3−3−x; Li et al 2007), and Menglongipus (formula x−1−2−1−x; Xing et al 2009); Velociraptorichnus and Paravipus lack distinct digital pads.…”
Section: Systematic Ichnologymentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While we recognize the subjec− tivity inherently involved in ichnotaxonomy (owing to the subtle relationships between behaviour, substrate composi− tion, preservation, and the resultant track), we err on the side of caution in assigning the Yanguoxia tracks to Dromaeo− saripus (based on the aforementioned shared traits) rather than attempting to synonymize the preexisting species of Dromaeosauripus but erect a new ichnospecies to accommo− date the observed differences between those ichnotaxa (see following discussion). The divarication angles (mean: 19°) between digits III-IV in D. yongjingensis are greater than in Dromaeopodus (~5°; Li et al 2007), Paravipus (5-15°; Mudroch et al 2010), Dro− maeosauripus hamanensis (5-10°; Kim et al 2008), Dro− maeosauripus jinjuensis (8-14°; Kim et al 2012), and the un− named Morocco didactyl tracks (16°; Ishigaki and Lockley 2010), but less than in Velociraptorichnus (21-28°; Zhen et al 1994;Xing et al 2009) and Menglongipus (41-44°). One of the most striking differences is the digital pad formula: the x−1−3−4−x digital pad formula of D. yongjingensis differenti− ates it from other Dromaeosauripus (formula x−1−4−4−x; Kim et al 2008Kim et al , 2012, Dromaeopodus (formula x−1−3−3−x; Li et al 2007), and Menglongipus (formula x−1−2−1−x; Xing et al 2009); Velociraptorichnus and Paravipus lack distinct digital pads.…”
Section: Systematic Ichnologymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…After a hiatus of more than a decade, a mass of new dromaeopodid track discoveries in China closely followed one another, in− cluding unnamed, Early Cretaceous dromaeosaurid tracks from Yanguoxia, Yongjing County, Gansu Province , new specimens of Velociraptorichnus, the new ichnotaxon Dromaeopodus shandongensis from the Early Cretaceous of Junan, Shandong Province (Li et al 2007), and Menglongipus sinensis from the Jurassic-Cretaceous bound− ary of Chicheng, Hebei Province (Xing et al 2009). Reports outside China include unnamed ichnites from the earliest Cretaceous of Germany (Richter et al 2007), unnamed ichni− tes of dubious quality from the Early Cretaceous of Utah (Lockley et al 2004), Dromaeosauripus hamanensis and the recently−erected Dromaeosauripus jinjuensis from South Korea (Kim et al 2008(Kim et al , 2012, Paravipus didactyloides from the Middle Jurassic of Niger (Mudroch et al 2010), and un− named tracks from possibly the Early Jurassic of Morocco (Ishigaki and Lockley 2010). Dromaeosaurid tracks have also been confirmed from the Late Cretaceous of Utah (Cow− an et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digit II impression of Paravipes didactyloides is superficially somewhat similar in morphology to digit II impressions of dromaeosaur tracks as they are rounded or oval in shape ( fig. 5 in Mudrock et al, 2011; in press a). Clearly, reasonably well-preserved trackways provide the best chance to avoid misidentification of pathologies or evolutionary digit reductions or habitual digit retractions.…”
Section: Vertebrate Ichnopathology 247mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other didactyl tracks of uncertain affinity include Paravipus didactyloides from the Middle Jurassic of Niger (Mudroch et al, 2011), and a didactyl footprint from the Lower Jurassic of Morocco (Ishigaki and Lockley, 2010) that may be an extramorphological variant of a tridactyl track: see Lockley et al (2013) for review. Paravipus is no deinonychosaurian track (Lockley et al, 2013) and may be a swim track (Milner A.R.C.…”
Section: Ichnotaxonomy and Trackmaker Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%