Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '18 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3178876.3186055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Did You Really Just Have a Heart Attack?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the eRisk2019 training users to obtain the golden sentences. Following the approach by Karisani and Agichtein (2018), three experts in the field conducted the annotation process. The number of golden sentences was low, averaging 35 per symptom.…”
Section: Few Manually Labelled Sentences As Queriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used the eRisk2019 training users to obtain the golden sentences. Following the approach by Karisani and Agichtein (2018), three experts in the field conducted the annotation process. The number of golden sentences was low, averaging 35 per symptom.…”
Section: Few Manually Labelled Sentences As Queriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the annotation process, we removed all supplementary metadata to avoid bias in the annotators, such as the severity option label (0 − 3) of the user who wrote the sentence. We followed the same annotation procedure as Karisani and Agichtein (2018) to validate the annotation outcomes. This procedure consisted of two phases: 1) First, an initial annotator answered the following question in a binary setting (Positive/Negative): Does the sentence refer to the symptom, and the user talks about himself/herself (first person)?.…”
Section: A Manual Dataset and Annotation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One focus is on the analysis of Twitter with regards to pharmacovigilance. Other topics include the extraction of adverse drug reactions (Nikfarjam et al, 2015;Cocos et al, 2017), monitoring public health (Paul and Dredze, 2012;Choudhury et al, 2013;, and detecting personal health mentions (Yin et al, 2015;Karisani and Agichtein, 2018).…”
Section: Biomedical Text Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personal Health Mentions For S4, the training data consists of data from one disease domain, namely influenza, in two contexts: having a flu infection and getting a flu vaccination. To improve generalisability, we supplemented this data with six labelled data sets from different disease domains (Karisani and Agichtein, 2018). We refer to this combined data set as S4+.…”
Section: Additional Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Personal Health Mention Extraction The goal of Subtask 4 (S4) is to identify tweets that are personal health mentions, i.e. posts that mention a person who is affected as well as their specific condition (Karisani and Agichtein, 2018), as opposed to posts discussing health issues in general. Generalisability to both future data and different health domains is evaluated by including data from the same domain collected years after the training data, as well as data from entirely different disease domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%