2013
DOI: 10.1037/h0099206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Did sexual selection and culture interact in the evolution of human height?

Abstract: Human height is a quantitative trait influenced by genetics and environmental conditions. Historical records from several European nations show a rapid increase in average population heights during the 19th century. Improvements in nutrition and public health are known contributors to this increase, but, theoretically, evolutionary selection may have also played a role. Women prefer taller mates, and sexual selection for height has likely contributed to evolutionary changes in human height. However, cultural r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 80 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several lines of evidence suggest that height preference in humans is rooted in the signaling value of human stature. Adult height is the result of complex interactions between genetic factors and environmental conditions (Gahtan & Mark, 2013;Gustafsson & Lindenfors, 2009;Lango Allen et al, 2010;Lettre, 2011), and thus, it has been proposed as a good indicator of good health, status and cognitive abilities (Case & Paxson, 2006;Judge & Cable, 2004;Silventoinen, Lahelma, & Rahkonen, 1999; but see also Samaras, 2012). Human height has also been found to be negatively related to fluctuating asymmetry, which results from perturbations of the ontogenetic development, thus human height has also been considered as a proxy for good genes (Manning, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several lines of evidence suggest that height preference in humans is rooted in the signaling value of human stature. Adult height is the result of complex interactions between genetic factors and environmental conditions (Gahtan & Mark, 2013;Gustafsson & Lindenfors, 2009;Lango Allen et al, 2010;Lettre, 2011), and thus, it has been proposed as a good indicator of good health, status and cognitive abilities (Case & Paxson, 2006;Judge & Cable, 2004;Silventoinen, Lahelma, & Rahkonen, 1999; but see also Samaras, 2012). Human height has also been found to be negatively related to fluctuating asymmetry, which results from perturbations of the ontogenetic development, thus human height has also been considered as a proxy for good genes (Manning, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%