2020
DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/ws8et
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Did pre-Columbian populations of the Amazonian biome reach carrying capacity during the Late Holocene?

Abstract: The increasingly better-known archaeological record of the Amazon basin, the Orinoco basin, and the Guianas both questions the long-standing premise of a pristine tropical rainforest environment and also provides evidence for major biome-scale cultural and technological transitions prior to European colonisation. Associated changes in pre-Columbian human population size and density, however, are poorly known and often estimated on the basis of unreliable assumptions and guesswork. Drawing on recent development… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, our data indicate that maize either appears or becomes more dominant only after the development of Amazonian anthrosols. The development of ABEs may have allowed for the expansion of the cultivation of this productive crop beyond lake margins, which probably increased the carrying capacity of the land to sustain the large populations observed in the population growth trends using radiocarbon databases (Arroyo-Kalin and Riris, 2020). While maize likely played a supplemental role during its adoption and dispersal during the middle Holocene, it likely became a more important part of the diet with the development of Amazonian anthrosol agriculture.…”
Section: The Late Holocenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, our data indicate that maize either appears or becomes more dominant only after the development of Amazonian anthrosols. The development of ABEs may have allowed for the expansion of the cultivation of this productive crop beyond lake margins, which probably increased the carrying capacity of the land to sustain the large populations observed in the population growth trends using radiocarbon databases (Arroyo-Kalin and Riris, 2020). While maize likely played a supplemental role during its adoption and dispersal during the middle Holocene, it likely became a more important part of the diet with the development of Amazonian anthrosol agriculture.…”
Section: The Late Holocenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diversity of localized and dispersed examples of such constructions throughout most of the Amazon Basin demonstrates that the socio-political changes at the beginning of the first millennium CE occurred on a large scale. This coincides with the beginning period of population growth that was experienced in the Late Holocene [33]. Apparently, all these changes were not related to any specific ceramic tradition or cultural group, but to a series of long-term interactions.…”
Section: Archaeo-linguistic Historiesmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Early occupations of the Amazon were made by several kinds of tropical foragers societies, who first produced ceramics before 4000 BCE, a time when horticulture was still nascent in the region [31]. By around 1500 BCE one finds intense production of ceramics, sedentary life, population growth, development of extensive slash-and-burn agriculture and semi-intensive house gardens, which marked a new phase with major cultural changes in the natural landscape of Amazonia [31][32][33]. By 0 CE, there is greater evidence of large sedentary settlements, the construction of mounds, roads, canals, the formation of terras pretas (Amazonian Dark Earths, anthropic dark soils of high fertility produced by long-term occupations), and the construction of geoglyphs and monumental artificial structures in the Amazon River and some of its largest tributaries, such as the Upper Purús, Upper Madeira and Upper Xingú [34].…”
Section: Archaeo-linguistic Historiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies suggest that this exponential rate of growth was maintained until the arrival of Europeans, at least in Amazonia (Arroyo-Kalin, 2018), while others indicate a slowdown in growth or even a decrease in population size in some areas, possibly due to having reached carrying capacity, autochthonous diseases, or even climate and social change (Arroyo-Kalin and Riris, 2021;Bush et al, 2021). However, as expected, the majority of genetic and archeological data pointed to the highest mortality rate occurring after Europeans arrived in the Americas, probably peaking later in the colonization period (Browning et al, 2018;Jones et al, 2021;Castro e Silva et al, 2022).…”
Section: The South American Roots Of Human Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%