Did Post-enlargement Labor Mobility Help the EU to Adjust During the Great Recession? The Case of Slovakia

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu Combining information from various data sources including the Slovak Labor Force Survey and conducting our own statistical analysis of selectivity into migration, we study whether and how migration responded to asymmetric economic shocks at home and abroad. We identify a number of shifts in the directionality and composition of migration flows in terms of the destinations, gender, age, educational attainment and occupation, reflecting changing labor market conditions in receiving countries and Slovakia. We show that besides the standard demographic factors, migration propensity was higher among the unemployed and from the more depressed regions of Slovakia. We conclude that labor migration has served as an important adjustment mechanism in the country and more generally in the EU labor market. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E S

South-North Labour Migration Within the Crisis-Affected European Union: New Patterns, New Contexts and New Challenges

“…Indeed, the growing presence of Eastern European and third country migrants has strongly mitigated the demand for Southern EU migrants over the years. As suggested by the available data, Central and Eastern European migrants occupy mostly low-and mid-skilled labour positions primarily in low value-added economic sectors (Kahanec and Kurekova 2014 ). Nonetheless, it should also be noted that in the post-enlargement period, the share of EU10 migrants with high educational attainment residing in the EU15 has increased substantially (Kahanec 2013 ).…”

“…The linkages between the state of the European economies and migration have emerged as one of the most important topics in recent scientifi c debates on migration (Canetta et al 2014 ;Castles and Vezzoli 2009 ;. A growing number of publications have assessed the dynamics of the crisis and its impacts on the mobility patterns of EU nationals as well as of third country nationals (see Kahanec and Kurekova 2014 ;OECD 2011OECD , 2012Kaczmarczyk and Stanek 2015 ). What needs to be emphasized is that although in its initial phase, the economic deterioration spread throughout most of the developed countries, its consequences are not equally distributed among Member States (Kahanec and Zimmermann 2014 ).…”

The Impact of Eu Immigration on Economic Growth Through the Skill Composition Channel

“…Studies have shown that immigrants are more concentrated in the states that offer generous benefits and, as a result, the degree of participation to welfare systems are more sensible to changes in these benefits compared to the national population (Borjas, 1999a;Josifidis et al, 2014;Fuest & Thum, 1999). When conditions change unfavorably for migrants, the migration flows redirect to countries with greater opportunities on the labour market and more generous social protection systems (Kahanec & Kurekova, 2014).…”

“…Labour mobility is an important adjustment mechanism in the European Union labour market (Kahanec & Kurekova, 2014). Individuals have many reasons to migrate.…”

The labour market performance of young return migrants after the crisis in CEE countries: the case of Estonia

“…The question of selectivity to return is of major importance in the context of the wage assimilation of returnees. A number of empirical studies, including Kahanec and Zimmermann (2010), Pungas, Toomet, Tammaru, and Anniste (2012), Kahanec and Kureková (2014), and White (2014) have been devoted to the analysis of selection to return patterns and their interrelation with post-return integration outcomes.…”