2005
DOI: 10.1017/s0022050705050023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Did New Deal Grant Programs Stimulate Local Economies? A Study of Federal Grants and Retail Sales During the Great Depression

Abstract: Using data on New Deal grants to each U.S. county from 1933 to 1939, we estimate how relief and public works spending and payments to farmers through the Agricultural Adjustment Administration influenced retail consumption. On a per capita basis, we find that an additional dollar of public works and relief spending was associated with a 44 cent increase in 1939 retail sales. In contrast, the AAA seems to have had a negative effect on retail sales, suggesting that nonlandowners in the farm sector suffered dispr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
73
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
73
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Technologically-advanced capital goods, such as cotton harvesters, did not replace older 50 In a modified version of equation (6), the fraction of county flooded is interacted with a dummy variable for whether the county is a "plantation county" and a dummy variable for whether the county is a "nonplantation county." 51 As in equation (6), the specification controls for per-capita spending through the AAA, public works, relief, loan, and guaranteed loan programs (Fishback, Horrace and Kantor, 2005). Note that New Deal spending is potentially endogenous to the flood, particularly as networks developed by local politicians to obtain flood relief could be later used to secure New Deal spending.…”
Section: Vid Alternative Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technologically-advanced capital goods, such as cotton harvesters, did not replace older 50 In a modified version of equation (6), the fraction of county flooded is interacted with a dummy variable for whether the county is a "plantation county" and a dummy variable for whether the county is a "nonplantation county." 51 As in equation (6), the specification controls for per-capita spending through the AAA, public works, relief, loan, and guaranteed loan programs (Fishback, Horrace and Kantor, 2005). Note that New Deal spending is potentially endogenous to the flood, particularly as networks developed by local politicians to obtain flood relief could be later used to secure New Deal spending.…”
Section: Vid Alternative Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Robert Fleck (1999a), Fishback et al (2003a), andFishback et al (2005a) have had success using some of these political variables as instruments in studies of unemployment statistics, infant mortality, and retail sales growth, respectively. Of the group of instruments that have been proposed in the literature, only one variable meets the requirements that we have laid out above.…”
Section: Instrumental Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results in this paper add to a list of beneficial effects associated with New Deal spending on public works and relief. Other recent studies suggest that relief expenditures were associated with lower rates of infant mortality, fewer suicides, fewer deaths from some forms of disease, higher birth rates, more in-migration, and expansions in economic activity (see, for example, Fishback, Haines, and Kantor 2007;Fishback, Horrace, andKantor 2005, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%