2014
DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Did compulsory wear regulations increase personal flotation device (PFD) use by boaters in small power recreational vessels? A before-after observational study conducted in Victoria, Australia

Abstract: Objective To estimate the effect of the 2005 Victorian mandatory personal flotation device (PFD) wearing regulations on PFD use by occupants of small (hull length ≤4.8 m) power recreational vessels. Design Before-after observational study investigating the probability of PFD use among occupants of small vessels before and after the regulations were introduced compared with the probability of use by their counterparts on large power vessels (hull length >4.8-12 m) who were not required to wear PFDs before or af… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(21 reference statements)
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Victorian PFD wear observation study17 and the current study showed that a third of boaters on small powered vessels and half of the recreational boating drowning victims, respectively, were not complying with PFD wearing regulations in the postintervention periods studied. Ongoing enforcement and targeted public awareness are necessary to maintain the apparent effectiveness of Victoria's 2005 PFD wearing regulations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Victorian PFD wear observation study17 and the current study showed that a third of boaters on small powered vessels and half of the recreational boating drowning victims, respectively, were not complying with PFD wearing regulations in the postintervention periods studied. Ongoing enforcement and targeted public awareness are necessary to maintain the apparent effectiveness of Victoria's 2005 PFD wearing regulations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Strong supporting evidence for an association between these results and increased PFD wearing is provided by the before and after observation study of PFD use by recreational boaters in Victoria 17. The observation study, focused only on use by occupants of small (≤4.8 m in hull length) motorised vessels, found that their wearing rate increased from 22% preregulation (January to March 2005) through 54% in the transition year (January to March 2006) to 63% postregulation (January to March 2007) 17.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence indicates that use of personal flotation devices (PFDs) decreases the risks of drowning [10][11][12] and mandatory, rather than voluntary, use of life jackets as being the most effective means for increasing their use. 13 When investigating the coronial files for rock fishing fatalities in NSW from 1992-2000, Jones found that PFDs had not been used by any of the deceased.…”
Section: Behavioursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a cross-sectional observational design, Chung et al 4 report that life jacket use was much more likely among boaters required by law to wear a floatation device. Cassell and Newstead take a longitudinal perspective, contrasting life jacket use before and after a statewide legislative mandate in Victoria, Australia 5. They found that use increased from 22% to 63% among boaters on vessels covered by the law, but did not change among those on vessels that were exempt.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%