“…There were 28 studies evaluating stand-alone interventions that included the introduction of laws or liquor licensing regulations, such as one-way door policies, changes in trading hours, liquor sale restrictions, or risk-based licensing (RBL) schemes [ 25 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 57 , 64 , 67 , 81 , 83 , 87 , 88 , 91 – 93 , 98 , 104 , 108 , 112 , 115 , 116 , 119 , 122 , 125 , 129 , 130 , 135 , 139 , 141 ]. Of these studies, 22 were quantitative [ 25 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 64 , 67 , 81 , 83 , 87 , 88 , 91 , 93 , 98 , 104 , 108 , 112 , 116 , 122 , 125 , 129 , 130 , 135 ], 4 used mixed methods designs [ 57 , 92 , 116 , 119 ], and 2 were qualitative [ 139 , 141 ]. Of the 22 quantitative studies, 17 were rated as strong using the EPHPP [ 25 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 64 , 67 , 81 , 87 ,…”