2019
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dicyemida and Orthonectida: Two Stories of Body Plan Simplification

Abstract: * Genomic predictions were filtered by retaining only hits to the InterPro database and cleaned from the cephalopod contamination with BLAST searches against the NCBI nr database. * * Transcriptome assemblies were filtered with BLAST searches against the RefSeq database as detailed in Materials and Methods, Section "Assembly and Filtering of Dicyemid Sequences."

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Organismal scope or featured taxon Cunha & Giribet (2019) yes Gastropods Laumer et al (2019) yes Animals Lemer et al (2019) yes Bivalves Lozano-Fernandez et al (2019) yes Chelicerates Marlétaz et al (2019) yes Spiralia Philippe et al (2019) yes Bilateria Narayanan Kutty et al (2019) no Calyptratae Uribe et al (2019) no Gastropods Wolfe et al (2019) no Decapod crustaceans Zverkov et al (2019) no Dicyemida and Orthonectida Aouad et al (2018) yes Archaea Laumer et al (2018) yes Placozoa Otero-Bravo et al (2018) yes Pantoea Puttick et al (2018) yes Land plants Schwentner et al (2018) yes Pancrustacea Sousa et al (2018) yes Land plants Bennett & Mao (2018) no Fulgoroidea symbionts Eitel et al (2018) no Placozoa Manzano-Marín et al (2018) no Cinara strobi symbionts Feuda et al (2017) yes Animals Szabó et al (2017) yes Pseudococcidae symbionts Williams et al (2017) yes Archaea Schwentner et al (2017) no Pancrustacea Shin et al (2017) no Curculionoidea Simion et al (2017) no Animals Yoshida et al (2017) no Tardigrades Leliaert et al (2016) yes Viridiplantae Zhang et al (2016) yes Roseobacter CHAB-I-5 lineage He et al (2016) no Rhizaria Song et al (2016) no Holometabola Domman et al (2015) yes Plastids Luo (2015) yes SAR11 Petitjean et al (2015) yes Archaea Borowiec et al (2015) no Animals Derelle et al (2015) no Eukaryotes Wang & Wu (2015) no Mitochondria…”
Section: Citationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organismal scope or featured taxon Cunha & Giribet (2019) yes Gastropods Laumer et al (2019) yes Animals Lemer et al (2019) yes Bivalves Lozano-Fernandez et al (2019) yes Chelicerates Marlétaz et al (2019) yes Spiralia Philippe et al (2019) yes Bilateria Narayanan Kutty et al (2019) no Calyptratae Uribe et al (2019) no Gastropods Wolfe et al (2019) no Decapod crustaceans Zverkov et al (2019) no Dicyemida and Orthonectida Aouad et al (2018) yes Archaea Laumer et al (2018) yes Placozoa Otero-Bravo et al (2018) yes Pantoea Puttick et al (2018) yes Land plants Schwentner et al (2018) yes Pancrustacea Sousa et al (2018) yes Land plants Bennett & Mao (2018) no Fulgoroidea symbionts Eitel et al (2018) no Placozoa Manzano-Marín et al (2018) no Cinara strobi symbionts Feuda et al (2017) yes Animals Szabó et al (2017) yes Pseudococcidae symbionts Williams et al (2017) yes Archaea Schwentner et al (2017) no Pancrustacea Shin et al (2017) no Curculionoidea Simion et al (2017) no Animals Yoshida et al (2017) no Tardigrades Leliaert et al (2016) yes Viridiplantae Zhang et al (2016) yes Roseobacter CHAB-I-5 lineage He et al (2016) no Rhizaria Song et al (2016) no Holometabola Domman et al (2015) yes Plastids Luo (2015) yes SAR11 Petitjean et al (2015) yes Archaea Borowiec et al (2015) no Animals Derelle et al (2015) no Eukaryotes Wang & Wu (2015) no Mitochondria…”
Section: Citationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that lox2 evolved only after split of the common ancestor of those clades from remaining Spiralia and does not belong to the ancestral hox complement of all Spiralia (16). Whether absence of lox2 in lophophorates is plesiomorphic or represents evolutionary reversal depends on the position of Lophophorata within Spiralia, which is still debatable and not fully resolved (52)(53)(54)(55)94).…”
Section: Hox Gene Complement In Phoronidamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brachiopoda -into the group called Lophophorata (50,51), which recently gained support as a valid clade from several transcriptomic and phylogenomic studies (52)(53)(54)(55). Although originally the Lophophorata were considered as deuterostomes (50,51), molecular data showed their protostome affinity (56) and currently the lophophorates occupy a wellsupported position within the clade of Spiralia (52)(53)(54)(55)57). Phoronids develop through a distinctive planktotrophic larval stage, called actinotrocha (58)(59)(60)(61).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1a). Due to the presence of lophophore, Phoronida have been traditionally united with two other clades-Ectoprocta (Bryozoa) and Brachiopoda-into the group called Lophophorata [50,51], which recently gained support as a valid clade from several transcriptomic and phylogenomic studies [52][53][54][55]. Although originally the Lophophorata were considered as deuterostomes [50,51], molecular data showed their protostome affinity [56] and currently the lophophorates Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%