Using Online Dictionaries 2014
DOI: 10.1515/9783110341287.229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dictionary users do look up frequent words. A log file analysis

Abstract: Abstract:In this paper, we use the 2012 log files of two German online dictionaries (Digital Dictionary of the German Language1 and the German Version of Wiktionary) and the 100,000 most frequent words in the Mannheim German Reference Corpus from 2009 to answer the question of whether dictionary users really do look up frequent words, first asked by de Schryver et al. (2006). By using an approach to the comparison of log files and corpus data which is completely different from that of the aforementioned author… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we want to investigate whether this is a good strategy. We already showed that dictionary users indeed look up frequent words (Koplenig et al 2014). Here, we want to summarize our previous findings and evaluate them by transferring some of the methods we applied to the 2012 data from Wiktionary to the data from 2013.…”
Section: Correlation Between Corpus Frequency and Look-up Frequencymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, we want to investigate whether this is a good strategy. We already showed that dictionary users indeed look up frequent words (Koplenig et al 2014). Here, we want to summarize our previous findings and evaluate them by transferring some of the methods we applied to the 2012 data from Wiktionary to the data from 2013.…”
Section: Correlation Between Corpus Frequency and Look-up Frequencymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The first part of the analysis will examine the correlation between look-up frequency and corpus frequency (section 3). This section summarizes previous findings (Koplenig et al 2014). The second part of the analysis will consider questions of ambiguity and the role of (temporal) social relevance of words in connection with look-up frequency (section 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies reveal the role of electronic dictionaries in vocabulary learning but they are not without problems. One concern is that they do not reflect actual dictionary use, because users looked up both low-frequency words and high-frequency words in reading and translation, especially when high-frequency words have many different senses (Bogaards 1998;Frankenberg-Garcia 2011;Koplenig, Meyer and Müller-Spitzer 2014). Another problem is that most users consulted a dictionary to solve the problems arising during the linguistic activities rather than to memorize words.…”
Section: Studies Of Dictionary Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors for the first time ask a question later investigated more deeply in further studies (cf. De Schryver et al 2006, Verlinde and Binon 2010, Koplenig et al 2014, Trap-Jensen et al 2014, Müller-Spitzer et al 2015, about whether dictionary users actually look up frequent words. The research leads to an important conclusion: it seems that there is a relationship between the corpus frequency and the frequency of lookups.…”
Section: Log Files As a Tool Of Dictionary User Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%