Many modern Arabic dialects exhibit asymmetries in the direction of emphasis (for most dialects, pharyngealization) spread. In a dialect of Yemeni Arabic, emphasis has two articulatory correlates, pharyngealization and labialization: within the phonological word, pharyngealization spreads predominantly leftward, and labialization spreads rightward, targeting short high vowels. Since asymmetries in the directionality of spread of a secondary feature are phonetically motivated and depend on whether the feature is anchored to the onset or the release phase of the primary articulation, it is argued that the unmarked directionality of spread should be encoded in the phonology as a markedness statement on that feature. This article considers phonological emphasis in Arabic. It is divided into two parts. I first discuss an article by Davis (1995) on asymmetries in emphasis spread (spread of [RTR]) in two dialects of Palestinian Arabic, and argue for the significance of directionality in emphasis spread. I then present further supporting arguments for a hypothesis regarding directionality of spread by considering data from S . an»ānī, a dialect of Yemeni Arabic, in which emphasis has two articulatory correlates, pharyngealization and labialization, and by discussing the asymmetries in the directionality of spread, particularly of labialization, in this dialect.
Emphasis Spread and Grounded PhonologyIn an article on emphasis spread in two modern Palestinian dialects of Arabic, Davis (1995) adopts Grounded Phonology (Archangeli and Pulleyblank 1994) to account for sets of opaque Thanks to Barry Heselwood for spectrographic analysis of my data and for reading and commenting on various drafts of this article; to James Dickins; to Judith Broadbent; and to S. J. Hannahs, Mike Davenport, Phil Carr, and other members of the Phonology Reading Group at Durham University for providing critical comments on earlier versions. Thanks also to two anonymous reviewers for LI.