2015 IEEE 25th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/mlsp.2015.7324357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dictionary extraction from a collection of spectrograms for bioacoustics monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In experiments, we present an application of the proposed approach for (i) denoising spectrograms, which are corrupted by rain noise, (ii) unsupervised bird syllable discovery and (iii) supervised classification of birdsong recordings. This paper extends our work in [24] to include detailed derivations as well as a multi-label classification framework for the proposed dictionary learning approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In experiments, we present an application of the proposed approach for (i) denoising spectrograms, which are corrupted by rain noise, (ii) unsupervised bird syllable discovery and (iii) supervised classification of birdsong recordings. This paper extends our work in [24] to include detailed derivations as well as a multi-label classification framework for the proposed dictionary learning approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…. , D K } and the sparse Figure 1 Reproduction of a convolutive model for dictionary learning [24]. This illustration shows how the elements Y i (f, t) of a spectrogram are computed by applying the convolution operation between the elements of the dictionary words d 1 (t, f ), d 2 (t, f ) and d 3 (t, f ), and the activation signals a i 1 (t), a i 2 (t) and a i 3 (t).…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to provide a benchmark, we considered a two-step approach: a generative convolutive dictionary learning method followed by a classifier. 3 For the implementation of the generative dictionary learning method, we chose [49] (used previously on the HJA dataset) and constructed a generative dictionary D = {d 1 , d 2 , . .…”
Section: B Synthetic Datasets and Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the 10 MC runs, we evaluated the proposed GDL-LR approach by trained on a fixed number of 5000 outer iterations as in [49]. We vary the dictionary window size T d ∈ {5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80}, sparsity regularization λ s ∈ {10 −8 , 10 −6 , 10 −4 , 10 −2 , 10 0 , 10 2 } and the number of dictio-2 These class templates are defined by selecting the most frequent 3 patterns in the generated 2-D signals.…”
Section: B Synthetic Datasets and Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%