DICOM segmentation and STL creation for 3D printing: a process and software package comparison for osseous anatomy

Abstract

Background: Extracting and three-dimensional (3D) printing an organ in a region of interest in DICOM images typically calls for segmentation as a first step in support of 3D printing. The DICOM images are not exported to STL data immediately, but segmentation masks are exported to STL models. After primary and secondary processing, including noise removal and hole correction, the STL data can be 3D printed. The quality of the 3D model is directly related to the quality of the STL data. This study focuses and reports on the DICOM to STL segmentation performance for nine software packages. Methods: Multidetector row CT scanning was performed on a dry human mandible with two 10-mm-diameter bearing balls as a phantom. The DICOM image file was then segmented and exported to an STL file using nine different commercial/open-source software packages. Once the STL models were created, the data (file) properties and the size and volume of each file were measured, and differences across the software packages were noted. Additionally, to evaluate differences between the shapes of the STL models by software package, each pair of STL models was superimposed, with the observed differences between their shapes characterized as the shape error. Results: The data (file) size of the STL file and the number of triangles that constitute each STL model were different across all software packages, but no statistically significant differences were found across software packages. The created ball STL model expanded in the X-, Y-, and Z-axis directions, with the length in the Z-axis direction (body axis direction) being slightly longer than that in the other directions. The mean shape error between software packages of the mandibular STL model was 0.11 mm, but there was no statistically significant difference between them. Conclusions: Our results revealed that there are some differences between the software packages that perform the segmentation and STL creation of the DICOM image data. In particular, the features of each software package appeared in the fine and thin areas of the osseous structures. When using these software packages, it is necessary to understand the characteristics of each.

Active Materials for 3D Printing in Small Animals: Current Modalities and Future Directions for Orthopedic Applications

“…Several thresholds can be set to display only pixels with gray values in the target range. Finally, 3D models can be created from the segmented areas of interest [14,16,18]. Primary processing can begin after exporting the data to a 3D CAD compatible file format, such as the intermediate data STL file format.…”

“…Using CAD tools, structures' profiles are separated into various polygons, typically triangles, which may vary from 30,000 to millions, depending on the scale and the model complexity. The number of polygons is directly proportional to the resolution; raising the number of polygons results in a sharper and more precise surface, but it significantly increases the data size and causes further delays in processing [16,18]. When reverse-engineering scanners are used to obtain a data point package, similar software creates STL archives.…”

“…By inserting sequential layers of material to recreate the virtual cross-sections, a 3D printing system then manufactures the 3D physical model. Nevertheless, the accuracy of the final 3D model is influenced by each phase of the process, including DICOM image segmentation, STL data processing, G-code data generation, and 3D printer output [14,18].…”

Angular and linear measurements of adult flexible flatfoot via weight-bearing CT scans and 3D bone reconstruction tools

“…Many dedicated software packages are available for this, from freeware tools with basic functions 35 , to expensive packages with effective algorithms and features. A best possible software would support the user in accurately defining these 3D bone models, and at the same time would not require extensive manual work from an expert operator; for each different clinical or biomechanical application, a good compromise should be found between automation of the process and quality of the final result 35 , 36 . Among these software packages for 3D bone reconstruction, Mimics Innovation Suite (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium)—MIS—represents the state-of-the-art for fully supported semi-automatic segmentation of any bone structure, and on the other hand Bonelogic Ortho Foot and Ankle (Disior, Helsinki, Finland)—DIS—represents a most modern tool for fully automatic segmentation of foot bones.…”

Volumetric Lattice Boltzmann Method for Wall Stresses of Image-based Pulsatile Flows

“…The DICOM is most common for medical images scanned from CTA or MRI. Techniques for DICOM image segmentation [29] and STL conversion from DICOM segmentation [49] have been developed. Whereas all modern CAD (Computer-Aided Design) software such as SolidWorks export their native file format into STL.…”