2016
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b05868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dichotomous Role of Exciting the Donor or the Acceptor on Charge Generation in Organic Solar Cells

Abstract: In organic solar cells, photoexcitation of the donor or acceptor phase can result in different efficiencies for charge generation. We investigate this difference for four different 2-pyridyl diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP) polymer-fullerene solar cells. By comparing the external quantum efficiency spectra of the polymer solar cells fabricated with either [60]PCBM or [70]PCBM fullerene derivatives as acceptor, the efficiency of charge generation via donor excitation and acceptor excitation can both be quantified. Su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
71
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7d,14] The LUMO–LUMO energy offsets between the donor and the acceptors (BTA2, 1, 3) are respectively 0.05, 0.21, 0.35 eV and the HOMO–HOMO energy offsets are respectively 0.11, 0.14, 0.17 eV. This gradual change of energy offsets will offer an excellent parameter for the study on the charge generation process …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7d,14] The LUMO–LUMO energy offsets between the donor and the acceptors (BTA2, 1, 3) are respectively 0.05, 0.21, 0.35 eV and the HOMO–HOMO energy offsets are respectively 0.11, 0.14, 0.17 eV. This gradual change of energy offsets will offer an excellent parameter for the study on the charge generation process …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] A linear correlation between V oc and the HOMO and LUMO energies with slope 1 has also been seen in various other studies, [6,54] usually for a smaller set of materials, but deviations with slope <1 have also been reported. For solar cells of the polymers in Table 1, 2PyT (E g = 1.73 eV) gave the lowest short-circuit current density (J sc ) (7.00 mA cm −2 ), [56] while TDTPT (E g = 1.23 eV) gave the highest J sc (20.5 mA cm −2 ), [57] i.e., a factor of ≈3. Nevertheless, it is of interest to consider possible explanations for our finding of a slope <1.…”
Section: Correlation Between Homo Energies and V Ocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47] Surprisingly, they found that excitation of the fullerene is accompanied by a substantially larger energy loss (at least 0.85 eV), while the threshold for efficient cells after excitation of the donor polymer can be slightly less than 0.6 eV. Although the microscopic origin for this significant difference is not clear yet, other groups have reported further examples of remarkably small energy losses using non-fullerene acceptors.…”
Section: Reducing the Driving Forcementioning
confidence: 98%