1996
DOI: 10.1016/0893-133x(95)00180-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dichotic Listening before and after Fluoxetine Treatment for Major Depression: Relations of Laterality to Therapeutic Response

Abstract: Despite the wide variance in therapeutic response to antidepressants, there are few clinical or biological predictors of treatment outcome. Studies have suggested the possible value of dichotic listening measures of perceptual asymmetry (PA) as predictors of treatment response. This study examined the relation between outcome of fluoxetine treatment and performance on verbal and nonverbal dichotic tests. As part of a multisite study, 86 outpatients with major depression were tested on dichotic fused-words and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
28
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, SSRI responders may have an abnormality of the serotonergic neurotransmitter system that is not shared by patients who do not respond to an SSRI. Our current findings and those of prior studies support the existence of treatment-responsive and -nonresponsive subtypes of depression that differ in functional brain asymmetry (Bruder et al, 1990(Bruder et al, , 1996Stewart et al, 1999). Our findings also suggest the possible clinical value of dichotic listening tests for predicting therapeutic response to an SSRI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, SSRI responders may have an abnormality of the serotonergic neurotransmitter system that is not shared by patients who do not respond to an SSRI. Our current findings and those of prior studies support the existence of treatment-responsive and -nonresponsive subtypes of depression that differ in functional brain asymmetry (Bruder et al, 1990(Bruder et al, , 1996Stewart et al, 1999). Our findings also suggest the possible clinical value of dichotic listening tests for predicting therapeutic response to an SSRI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This was the case in two separate studies, one with patients having an MDD and the other with patients having a mixture of affective disorders, including MDD, dysthymia, or depression not otherwise specified. The consistency of findings across these studies and our prior study (Bruder et al, 1996) indicates that the difference in hemispheric asymmetry between fluoxetine responders and nonresponders is robust and replicable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cook et al (16) did not find pretreatment differences between fluoxetine responders and nonresponders in theta, but did find group differences in "cordance", a measure based on a form of surface Laplacian (see Tenke and Kayser [17] for a discussion of methodological limitations). We found a difference in alpha asymmetry between fluoxetine responders and nonresponders (8), which was predicted on the basis of dichotic listening findings (18). Fluoxetine nonresponders showed greater alpha power (less activity) over the left hemisphere than the right, whereas responders tended to have the opposite asymmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Bruder et al (1990) first reported a relationship between perceptual asymmetry following dichotic listening tasks at baseline and outcome during TCA therapy, such that patients with a left-ear advantage were significantly more likely to be responders than those without. This has since been replicated with the SSRI fluoxetine (Bruder et al 1996(Bruder et al , 2004, and the NDRI bupropion (Bruder et al 2007). Unfortunately, studies linking preferential response to antidepressant agents for MDD patients with a right-ear advantage have not been published to date.…”
Section: Brain Functional Asymmetry (Dichotic Listening)mentioning
confidence: 90%