2006
DOI: 10.1107/s1600536806039869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dichloro(η6-p-cymene)(triphenylphosphine)ruthenium(II)

Abstract: Key indicatorsSingle-crystal X-ray study T = 150 K Mean (C-C) = 0.004 Å R factor = 0.028 wR factor = 0.067 Data-to-parameter ratio = 20.1 For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(4 reference statements)
8
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure of complex 1 reported here adopts the classic piano stool structure with a pseudo-tetrahedral arrangement of the p-cymene, chloride anions and the phosphane about the ruthenium metal center. The bond lengths and angles about the Ru core compare well with 2 (Albertin, et al, 2010) and 3 (Elsegood, et al, 2006), which have been investigated previously ( Table 1). The average Ru -C distance is 2.217 (3) Å, which is very similar to the previously reported Ru -C distances of 2.218 (4) Å and 2.218 (2) Å for 2 and 3, respectively.…”
Section: S1 Commentsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The structure of complex 1 reported here adopts the classic piano stool structure with a pseudo-tetrahedral arrangement of the p-cymene, chloride anions and the phosphane about the ruthenium metal center. The bond lengths and angles about the Ru core compare well with 2 (Albertin, et al, 2010) and 3 (Elsegood, et al, 2006), which have been investigated previously ( Table 1). The average Ru -C distance is 2.217 (3) Å, which is very similar to the previously reported Ru -C distances of 2.218 (4) Å and 2.218 (2) Å for 2 and 3, respectively.…”
Section: S1 Commentsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…These catalysts have been found to be susceptible to poisoning by cyanide, which forms when cyanohydrins decompose in aqueous solutions. The title compound [Ru(η 6 -p-cymene)Cl 2 PPh 2 OEt] (1), as well as the similar compounds [Ru(η 6 -pcymene)Cl 2 PPhOEt 2 ], (Albertin, et al, 2010), 2, and [Ru(η 6 -p-cymene)Cl 2 PPh 3 ] (3), (Elsegood, et al, 2006), have been used previously to hydrate nitriles in aqueous solutions, where addition of surfactant was used to increase the solubility of the catalyst by promoting the formation of micelles (Cavarzan, et al, 2010). It was hypothesized that a hydrophobic catalyst would be resistant to cyanide poisoning under biphasic conditions, because the cyanide would be in the aqueous phase and the catalyst in the organic phase.…”
Section: S1 Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of 7 is depicted in Figure ; it exhibits a structure similar to that of 1b . The Ru(1)–P(1) bond [2.3427(7) Å] is in good agreement with that in ( p ‐cymene)Ru(PPh 3 )Cl 2 [2.3438(6) Å], and a little shorter than that in 1b [2.4034(7) Å].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…34 The distances between the ruthenium atom and the centre of the arene rings (S 1.745 Å, Se 1.746 Å) are typical for such η 6 -arene ruthenium compounds. 48 The palladium complexes ( Fig. 3) show square-planar coordination with one bidentate chalcogenoureato and a 1,10-phenanthroline ligand bound to the metal.…”
Section: Synthesis and Crystal Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%