2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.804960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diatoms Versus Copepods: Could Frustule Traits Have a Role in Avoiding Predation?

Abstract: Predation is one of the strongest selection pressures phytoplankton has evolved strategies to cope with. Concurrently, phytoplankton growth must deal with resource acquisition. Experiments on mono- and mixed cultures of morphologically different diatoms exposed to copepods were performed to assess if size and shape were primary drivers in avoiding predation. Additionally, frustule silicification was investigated as a potential factor affecting prey selection by copepods. Thalassiosira pseudonana, Conticribra w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…predation pressure, may have influenced both observed paleontological patterns and inferred temporal variation in seawater composition (Falkowski et al, 2004;Zachos et al, 2008;Ratti et al, 2013;Lazarus et al, 2014;Conley et al, 2017;Giordano et al, 2018;Petrucciani et al, 2022). The experiments reported here confirm that whatever other factors inform our understanding of Mesozoic-Cenozoic diatom evolution, declining DSi could have had a direct influence on diatom growth, physiology, and morphogenesis.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…predation pressure, may have influenced both observed paleontological patterns and inferred temporal variation in seawater composition (Falkowski et al, 2004;Zachos et al, 2008;Ratti et al, 2013;Lazarus et al, 2014;Conley et al, 2017;Giordano et al, 2018;Petrucciani et al, 2022). The experiments reported here confirm that whatever other factors inform our understanding of Mesozoic-Cenozoic diatom evolution, declining DSi could have had a direct influence on diatom growth, physiology, and morphogenesis.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Data suggest that over geologic time, DSi availability has affected the overall C allocation pattern of diatoms (in particular pennates) and, therefore, predation pressure via its influence on palatability for predators. Thus, DSi decline has favored the evolution of energysaving, less palatable cells, which are more competitive in intraspecific and interspecific interactions (Petrucciani et al, 2022).…”
Section: Cell Composition In Reconstructed Paleoenvironments: Facing ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details and settings for the IFC data acquisition were as follows: 10 µm core size diameter, 132 mm/s speed, and 20× magnification; bright field data were collected in channel 1 (LED intensity 35.46 mW), and chloroplast autofluorescence data were collected in channel 5 (642 nm, laser 2 mW). Post-acquisition data analysis was performed using the IDEAS software package following the procedure illustrated in Petrucciani et al. (2022a) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, frustule traits indirectly control sinking capacity by changing cell density. In particular, Si deposition shows a phenotypical response to different external environmental factors (i.e., predators, nutrient availability, pH, temperature, salinity, and light intensity) affecting cell density ( Durbin, 1977 ; Brzezinski et al., 1990 ; Flynn and Martin-Jezequel, 2000 ; Pondaven et al., 2007 ; Vrieling et al., 2007 ; Hervé et al., 2012 ; Shrestha et al., 2012 ; Su et al., 2018 ; Xu et al., 2021 ; Petrucciani et al., 2022a ). Among them, light is a crucial driver in the distribution of phytoplankton through the water column, not only affecting their photosynthetic performance, but also influencing cell density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Akin to nutrient starvation or limitation, many other abiotic factors contribute to the biochemistry of microalgae ( Figure 2 ). Additionally, biotic factors such as competition for resources, predation, and symbiosis can drastically affect the behavior and composition of microalgae [ 18 , 20 , 21 ]. The presence of predators affects algal palatability, modulating their organic composition, and activating their chemical defenses [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%