Association between coronary lesion severity and distal microvascular resistance in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 285: H2194-H2200, 2003. First published June 26, 2003 10.1152/ajpheart.01021.2002.-Homogeneity of microvascular resistance in different perfusion areas of the same heart is generally assumed. We investigated the effect of the severity of an epicardial stenosis on microvascular resistance in 27 patients with coronary artery disease and stable angina. All patients had an angiographically normal coronary artery, an artery with an intermediate lesion, and an artery with a severe lesion; the latter was treated with angioplasty. In each patient, distal blood flow velocity and pressure were measured during baseline and maximal hyperemia (induced by intracoronary adenosine) using a Doppler and pressure guide wire, respectively. The ratio of mean distal pressure to average peak blood flow velocity was used as an index for the microvascular resistance (MRv). Within patients, the hyperemic MRv was higher in arteries with more severe stenosis (P ϭ 0.021). After percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), the hyperemic MRv decreased (pre-PTCA, 2.6 vs. post-PTCA, 1.9 mmHg⅐cm Ϫ1 s
Ϫ1, P Ͻ 0.01) toward the value of the reference artery (1.7 mmHg⅐cm Ϫ1 s
Ϫ1; P ϭ 0.67). We conclude that there is a positive association between coronary lesion severity and variability of distal microvascular resistance that normalizes after angioplasty. This study challenges the concept of uniform distribution of hyperemic MRv that is relevant for the interpretation of both noninvasive and invasive diagnostic tests. microcirculation; coronary disease; physiology; blood flow; blood pressure SEVERAL INTRACORONARY-DERIVED physiological parameters have been introduced to characterize functional stenosis severity in patients with coronary artery disease, allowing clinical decision making during cardiac catheterization. These parameters are based on intracoronary pressure measurements (fractional flow reserve, FFR) or intracoronary-derived Doppler flow velocity measurements (coronary flow velocity reserve, CFVR) (13). Recently, our laboratory (14) has shown that variability in microvascular resistance between patients is responsible for discordant results between FFR and CFVR. High microvascular resistance was associated with a low CFVR and a high FFR, whereas low microvascular resistance was associated with a high CFVR and low FFR in patients with intermediate coronary lesions. Furthermore, homogeneity in the behavior of the myocardial resistance beds of the major perfusion areas within the same heart is assumed. This is of importance for the concept of relative CFVR. This assumption conflicts with the heterogeneity of myocardial blood flow found in different coronary perfusion areas in healthy volunteers (4). Recently, a paradoxical increase of microvascular resistance downstream from a severe coronary narrowing during tachycardia was reported (17), which was abolished after angioplasty. ...