2019
DOI: 10.1080/1369183x.2019.1693887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diaspora incorporation mechanisms: sustained and episodic mobilisation among the British-Egyptian diaspora after the Arab Spring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dominant geographies of the migration‐development nexus presume the movement of people from the global South to the global North, with diasporic‐led development centred around the transfer of varying forms of capital from unified groups of migrants connected through shared ancestry and values, oriented to bringing material changes to a static homeland (Brah, 1996; Mohan, 2008; Rollins, 2010). Scholarship in development studies, politics, geography and international relations amongst others, has considered diasporic relationships to countries of heritage, often in the global South, through varying forms of civic engagement and participation for example, hometown associations (HTAs) (Bada, 2015; Fischer, 2018; Lamba‐Nieves, 2018; Mercer et al., 2008; Strunk, 2014; Symth, 2017), financial and social remittances (Burman, 2002; Page & Mercer, 2012; Smyth, 2017) and political activism (Adamson, 2020; Bernal, 2018; Godin, 2018; Ho & McConnell, 2019; Kennedy, 2019; Koinova, 2018; Ndlovu, 2014). These bodies of work articulate the interconnected nature of diasporic engagement, with Mercer et al.…”
Section: The Diaspora‐development Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominant geographies of the migration‐development nexus presume the movement of people from the global South to the global North, with diasporic‐led development centred around the transfer of varying forms of capital from unified groups of migrants connected through shared ancestry and values, oriented to bringing material changes to a static homeland (Brah, 1996; Mohan, 2008; Rollins, 2010). Scholarship in development studies, politics, geography and international relations amongst others, has considered diasporic relationships to countries of heritage, often in the global South, through varying forms of civic engagement and participation for example, hometown associations (HTAs) (Bada, 2015; Fischer, 2018; Lamba‐Nieves, 2018; Mercer et al., 2008; Strunk, 2014; Symth, 2017), financial and social remittances (Burman, 2002; Page & Mercer, 2012; Smyth, 2017) and political activism (Adamson, 2020; Bernal, 2018; Godin, 2018; Ho & McConnell, 2019; Kennedy, 2019; Koinova, 2018; Ndlovu, 2014). These bodies of work articulate the interconnected nature of diasporic engagement, with Mercer et al.…”
Section: The Diaspora‐development Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%