2010
DOI: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diary Studies in Organizational Research

Abstract: Abstract. In recent years, researchers in work and organizational psychology have increasingly become interested in short-term processes and everyday experiences of working individuals. Diaries provide the necessary means to examine these processes. Although diary studies have become more popular in recent years, researchers not familiar with this method still find it difficult to get access to the required knowledge. In this paper, we provide an introduction to this method of data collection. Using two diary … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
583
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 773 publications
(607 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
15
583
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…For event sampling and diary studies, different data collection modalities are available, such as handheld computers or online surveys, which all have specific advantages and disadvantages (Ohly, Sonnentag, Niessen, & Zapf, 2010). In the present study, we chose to use paper-and-pencil surveys in order not to restrict the sample to a potentially preselected group of participants who had Internet access or basic computer/smartphone skills (cf.…”
Section: Limitations Strengths and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For event sampling and diary studies, different data collection modalities are available, such as handheld computers or online surveys, which all have specific advantages and disadvantages (Ohly, Sonnentag, Niessen, & Zapf, 2010). In the present study, we chose to use paper-and-pencil surveys in order not to restrict the sample to a potentially preselected group of participants who had Internet access or basic computer/smartphone skills (cf.…”
Section: Limitations Strengths and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we chose to use paper-and-pencil surveys in order not to restrict the sample to a potentially preselected group of participants who had Internet access or basic computer/smartphone skills (cf. Ohly et al, 2010). Participants self-reported times of filling in the respective surveys provided some indication that they complied with study instructions and did indeed fill in the daily surveys separately within the instructed time frames.…”
Section: Limitations Strengths and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a day-level approach enables us to learn more about variations in levels of creativity during the day and the underlying processes in terms of daily changing circumstances (see also Ohly, Sonnentag, Niessen, & Zapf, 2010).Further, we will use the Demand-Induced Strain Compensation Recovery (DISC-R) Model (De Jonge & Dormann, 2003De Jonge et al, 2012) as a theoretical framework for this study. This model provides the opportunity to investigate the influence of specific daily work conditions on detachment effects, because along with detachment, it incorporates job demands and job resources.…”
Section: Divergent Effects Of Detachment From Work: a Day-level Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the previously mentioned autoregressive path-analytical model and in line with commonly encountered analytical procedures applied to this kind of repeated measurement data (e.g., Binnewies, Sonnentag, & Mojza, 2009;Ohly, Sonnentag, Niessen, & Zapf, 2010), we also ran a multilevel model with repeated measurements (level 1) nested within individuals (level 2). In a sense, this is an aggregated model, which does not allow for identifying a pattern in the observed relationships over time, and as a consequence does not provide the high level of confidence that can be obtained from our autoregressive path-analytical model.…”
Section: Analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%