2015
DOI: 10.1159/000381401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diaphragm Pacing without Tracheostomy in Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome Patients

Abstract: Background: Congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (CCHS) is a rare disorder affecting central control of breathing. Thus, patients require lifelong assisted ventilation. Diaphragm pacing (DP) may permit decannulation in those who are ventilator dependent only during sleep. Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine if patients with CCHS can be successfully ventilated by DP without tracheostomy. Methods: We reviewed the records of 18 CCHS patients (mean age 19.5 ± 10.1 years; 44% female) who wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
41
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The ideal candidates for phrenic nerve pacing are patients with upper level spinal cord injury that are still ventilator dependent at least three months after the initial injury: the beneficial effects of pacing were mostly demonstrated in this population, with the majority of patients being liberated from ventilatory support [171,172,173]. Successful cases have also been reported with patients with congenital hypoventilation [174,175,176] syndrome and other neurological diseases [177]. Some data originally suggested a possible benefit of phrenic nerve pacing in patients with ALS [178,179], but two recent, prospective randomized trials evaluating the effect of this intervention in this setting had to be prematurely stopped because of a decrease in survival in the treatment arms [180,181].…”
Section: Therapeutic Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideal candidates for phrenic nerve pacing are patients with upper level spinal cord injury that are still ventilator dependent at least three months after the initial injury: the beneficial effects of pacing were mostly demonstrated in this population, with the majority of patients being liberated from ventilatory support [171,172,173]. Successful cases have also been reported with patients with congenital hypoventilation [174,175,176] syndrome and other neurological diseases [177]. Some data originally suggested a possible benefit of phrenic nerve pacing in patients with ALS [178,179], but two recent, prospective randomized trials evaluating the effect of this intervention in this setting had to be prematurely stopped because of a decrease in survival in the treatment arms [180,181].…”
Section: Therapeutic Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tracheostomy with positive pressure ventilation is the most common method for ventilation in infants with CCHS and is guaranteed to secure the airways and provide adequate ventilation 15) . However, consi dering the complications of long-term use of invasive ventilator care, non-invasive ventilation methods including BiPAP and diaphragmatic pacing have also been frequently attempted 16) . Long-term prognosis is variable, with mortality rates ranging from 10% to 40% 17) .…”
Section: Results Of Genetic Analysis Of the Phox2b Genementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nyere studier tyder på at ikke-invasiv respirasjonsstøtte kan vaere like effektivt og gi faerre komplikasjoner, men dette krever tett oppfølging, med blant annet polysomnografi, for å sikre at behandlingen er adekvat (26). Diafragmapacing for respirasjonskontroll er forsøkt både med og uten annen respirasjonsstøtte, men erfaringene er svaert begrensede (27,28).…”
Section: Diskusjonunclassified