Diaphragm Excursion-Time Index

Background: Respiratory workload increment in the process of mechanical ventilation withdrawal is critical for the determination of weaning outcome. Pressure, tidal volume (Vt) and respiratory rate (RR) are considered as patient’s respiratory power, albeit being affected by excessive respiratory load. We aimed to evaluate the performance of driving pressure (DP)×RR to predict the outcome of weaning.Methods: Plateau pressure (Pplat) and positive end-expiratory pressure tot (PEEPtot) were measured during mechanical ventilation, viz., (1) brief deep sedation, (2) on volume support ventilation of MV with Vt 6 ml/kg and a PEEP of 0 cm H2O, (3) Pplat and PEEPtot were measured by holding breath for 2s after inhalation and exhalation, respectively. The DP was determined as Pplat minus PEEPtot. The highest RR was recorded within 3 min during spontaneous-breathing trial (SBT). Patients that were able to tolerate SBT for 1 h were extubated.Results: Out of the 61 patients studied, 22 failed weaning. During the withdrawal of ventilation, DP×RR was 134.2±33.2 cmH2O·breaths/min and 238.5±61.7 cmH2O·breaths/min (P=0.00), DP was 7.9±1.6 cmH2O and 9.7±2.3 cmH2O (P=0.00), in the “success” and “failure” groups, respectively. The DP×RR index greater than 170 cmH2O·breaths/min had a sensitivity of 95.5% and a specificity of 89.7%, while DP index greater than 8.1 cmH2O had 81.8% sensitivity and 64.1% specificity to predict weaning failure.Conclusions: Measurement of DP×RR during withdrawal of ventilation may help predict weaning outcome. Noticeably, high DP×RR increased the likelihood of weaning failure.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of the product of driving pressure and respiratory rate for predicting failure of weaning from mechanical ventilator in medical patients

Gong

Zhang²,

Huang

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In contrast with the most accurate parameter RSBI [3], our index showed similar sensitivity and higher specificity. Even RSBI has limitations, including mean RSBI value less than 105 in the failure group [12]. Moreover, RSBI requires dynamic monitoring of tidal volume during SBT, which is not convenient.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of the product of driving pressure and respiratory rate for predicting failure of weaning from mechanical ventilator in medical patients

Gong

Zhang²,

Huang

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background : Respiratory workload increment in the process of mechanical ventilation withdrawal is critical for the determination of weaning outcome. Pressure, tidal volume (Vt) and respiratory rate (RR ) are considered as patient’s respiratory power, albeit being affected by excessive respiratory load. We aimed to evaluate the performance of driving pressure (DP)×RR to predict the outcome of weaning. Methods : Plateau pressure (Pplat) and positive end-expiratory pressure tot (PEEPtot) were measured during mechanical ventilation, viz., (1) brief deep sedation, (2) on volume support ventilation of MV with Vt 6 ml/kg and a PEEP of 0 cm H 2 O, (3) Pplat and PEEPtot were measured by holding breath for 2s after inhalation and exhalation, respectively. The DP was determined as Pplat minus PEEPtot. The highest RR was recorded within 3 min during spontaneous-breathing trial (SBT). Patients that were able to tolerate SBT for 1 h were directly extubated. These measurements correlated well with weaning outcome. Notably, patients in the “failure” group failed the SBT, died, while others required reintubation or noninvasive ventilation within 48 h of extubation. Results : Out of the 61 patients studied, 22 failed weaning. During the withdrawal of ventilation, DP×RR was 134.2±33.2 cmH 2 O ·breaths/min and 238.5±61.7 cmH 2 O·breaths/min ( P =0.00), DP was 7.9±1.6 cmH 2 O and 9.7±2.3 cmH 2 O ( P =0.00), in the “success” and “failure” groups, respectively. The DP×RR index greater than 170 cmH 2 O·breaths/min had a sensitivity of 95.5% and a specificity of 89.7%, while DP index greater than 8.1 cmH 2 O had 81.8% sensitivity and 64.1% specificity to predict weaning failure. Conclusions : Measurement of DP×RR during withdrawal of ventilation may help predict weaning outcome. Noticeably, high DP×RR increased the likelihood of weaning failure.

show abstract

“…A number of studies have investigated these two parameters, either individually or in combination, with the aim of identifying cut-off values as predictors of successful weaning (see Table 2) [43,53,[61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73]. However, the results have been heterogeneous in terms of outcome results and cut-off values due to differences in study protocol design and outcome designation.…”

Section: Diaphragm Ultrasound (Dus)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Mechanical ventilation weaning issues can be counted on the fingers of just one hand: part 1

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although mechanical ventilation may be a patient's vital ally during acute illness, it can quickly transform into an enemy during chronic conditions. The weaning process is the fundamental phase that enables the resumption of physiological respiratory function; however, it is also associated with a number of life-threatening complications, and a large percentage of critically ill patients never achieve airway device removal or require the resumption of mechanical ventilation just a few days post-weaning. Indeed, the weaning process is, at present, more of an art than a science. As such, there is urgent need for novel contributions from the scientific literature to abate the growing rates of morbidity and mortality associated with weaning failure. The physician attempting to wean a patient must integrate clinical parameters and common-sense criteria. Numerous studies have striven to identify single predictive factors of weaning failure and sought to standardize the weaning process, but the results are characterized by remarkable heterogeneity. Despite the lack of benchmarks, it is clear that the analysis of respiratory function must include a detailed overview of the five situations described below rather than a single aspect. The purpose of this two-part review is to provide a comprehensive description of these situations to clarify the "arena" physicians are entering when weaning critically ill patients from mechanical ventilation. Publisher's NoteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

show abstract

Diaphragm Excursion-Time Index

Cited by 61 publications

References 27 publications

Use of the product of driving pressure and respiratory rate for predicting failure of weaning from mechanical ventilator in medical patients

Use of the product of driving pressure and respiratory rate for predicting failure of weaning from mechanical ventilator in medical patients

Use of the product of driving pressure and respiratory rate for predicting failure of weaning from mechanical ventilator in medical patients

Mechanical ventilation weaning issues can be counted on the fingers of just one hand: part 1

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About