2014
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DIANA—algorithmic improvements for analysis of data-independent acquisition MS data

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
101
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SWATH/DIA data were analyzed via targeted, peptide‐centric analysis, querying 204,545 precursors based on the combined human assay library (CAL; Rosenberger et al , ) in the SWATH fragment ion chromatograms, using a modified OpenSWATH (Röst et al , ), PyProphet (Reiter et al , ; Teleman et al , ), and TRIC (Röst et al , ) workflow and the iPortal framework (Kunszt et al , ). Specifically, a global PyProphet scoring function was trained on a master sample of the unfractionated HEK293 lysate with tryptic digest and SWATH/DIA data acquisition equivalent to the fractionated samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SWATH/DIA data were analyzed via targeted, peptide‐centric analysis, querying 204,545 precursors based on the combined human assay library (CAL; Rosenberger et al , ) in the SWATH fragment ion chromatograms, using a modified OpenSWATH (Röst et al , ), PyProphet (Reiter et al , ; Teleman et al , ), and TRIC (Röst et al , ) workflow and the iPortal framework (Kunszt et al , ). Specifically, a global PyProphet scoring function was trained on a master sample of the unfractionated HEK293 lysate with tryptic digest and SWATH/DIA data acquisition equivalent to the fractionated samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SWATH data was analyzed using OpenSWATH (version 29995b387c238fdc58b 195b0390aadcb2b355aa6) (31) with the following parameters: Chromatograms were extracted with 50 ppm around the expected mass of the fragment ions and with an extraction window of Ϯ5 min around the expected retention time after iRT alignment. The best model to separate true from false positives (per run) was determined by pyprophet (version 0.9.1) with 10 cross-validation runs (42). The pyprophet software re-implements the mProphet algorithm (43), which uses target and decoy signals to compute an optimal discriminant score which is then applied to all peak groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is important for the deconvolution to acquire a sufficiently large number of MS/MS data points across chromatographic peaks. Other software tools such as OpenSWATH, DIANA, pSMART, Biognosys Spectronaut, or DIA‐Umpire are targeted toward the proteomics community and cannot be directly used for small molecule identifications for two reasons: first, in proteomics, SWATH‐MS/MS‐based identification relies solely on the MS/MS data. The fact that precursor ions are isolated with narrow Q1 isolation windows helps reducing the complexity of MS/MS spectra but MS 1 information about the precursor ions is not used at all.…”
Section: Instrumental Settings For Tandem Mass Spectrometersmentioning
confidence: 99%