2006
DOI: 10.1021/nl051860m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diameter-Dependent Electromechanical Properties of GaN Nanowires

Abstract: The diameter-dependent Young's modulus, E, and quality factor, Q, of GaN nanowires were measured using electromechanical resonance analysis in a transmission electron microscope. E is close to the theoretical bulk value ( approximately 300 GPa) for a large diameter nanowire (d=84 nm) but is significantly smaller for smaller diameters. At room temperature, Q is as high as 2,800 for d=84 nm, significantly greater than what is obtained from micromachined Si resonators of comparable surface-to-volume ratio. This i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

21
209
3
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
21
209
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental nanowire resonance frequencies (black circles) plotted as a function of the geometry factor G and fitted line through origin (solid line), yielding a constant Young's modulus E = (45 ± 3) GPa. The inset shows an enlarged view of the leftmost part of the plot indicated by a black rectangle, clearly demonstrating that the ten most flexible nanowires are equally well-described by the global value of E as their more rigid counterparts exhibiting a larger geometry factor G. Error bars on the G-axis include the uncertainty in determining r, R and h by SEM analysis.A possible explanation for this vast spread could be a dependence of Young's modulus on the geometric dimensions of the underlying nanowires, which is actively discussed in part of the research literature [12][13][14][15][33][34][35][36]. In order to elucidate possible size effects in our data, Young's modulus is additionally determined for each individual nanowire, again using eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental nanowire resonance frequencies (black circles) plotted as a function of the geometry factor G and fitted line through origin (solid line), yielding a constant Young's modulus E = (45 ± 3) GPa. The inset shows an enlarged view of the leftmost part of the plot indicated by a black rectangle, clearly demonstrating that the ten most flexible nanowires are equally well-described by the global value of E as their more rigid counterparts exhibiting a larger geometry factor G. Error bars on the G-axis include the uncertainty in determining r, R and h by SEM analysis.A possible explanation for this vast spread could be a dependence of Young's modulus on the geometric dimensions of the underlying nanowires, which is actively discussed in part of the research literature [12][13][14][15][33][34][35][36]. In order to elucidate possible size effects in our data, Young's modulus is additionally determined for each individual nanowire, again using eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for this vast spread could be a dependence of Young's modulus on the geometric dimensions of the underlying nanowires, which is actively discussed in part of the research literature [12][13][14][15][33][34][35][36]. In order to elucidate possible size effects in our data, Young's modulus is additionally determined for each individual nanowire, again using eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Conversely, the modulus of GaN nanowires increases with increasing diameter, reaching the bulk value at 84 nm. 9 The origin of the elastic modulus size dependence has been related to different effects such as the presence of defects 9,11 and the balance between surface and bulk properties as the surface-to-volume ratio varies. 10,12 The elastic properties of ZnO nanostructures and their size dependence have been previously investigated by means of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) 10,13,14 and atomic force microscopy (AFM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Because of the competition between atomic coordination and electronic distribution, surfaces can be softer or harder than the bulk. 12 As a consequence, mechanical properties like Young's modulus can be increased 13 or decreased 14 compared with those of bulk crystals by decreasing the nanowire cross section down to the nanoscale. By leveraging this class of phenomena, high values of strain were obtained in semiconducting nanostructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%