2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25591-5_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diameter and Broadcast Time of Random Geometric Graphs in Arbitrary Dimensions

Abstract: A random geometric graph (RGG) is defined by placing n points uniformly at random in [0, n 1/d ] d , and joining two points by an edge whenever their Euclidean distance is at most some fixed r. We assume that r is larger than the critical value for the emergence of a connected component with Ω(n) nodes. We show that, with high probability (w.h.p.), for any two connected nodes with a Euclidean distance of ω log n r d−1 , their graph distance is only a constant factor larger than their Euclidean distance. This i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a well-known heuristic argument for deriving the asymptotic order of the diameter (Barabási, 2015). A formal argument for the case of the random geometric graph can be found in Friedrich et al (2013). Also see the simulation evidence below.…”
Section: Sa4 Choice Of Bandwidthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a well-known heuristic argument for deriving the asymptotic order of the diameter (Barabási, 2015). A formal argument for the case of the random geometric graph can be found in Friedrich et al (2013). Also see the simulation evidence below.…”
Section: Sa4 Choice Of Bandwidthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only difference is that the probability of success should be reduced from 1 − O(n −1 ) to 1 − O(n −1/2 ). This follows from Lemma 1 in [13], which states that if a property holds for PPP then it also holds for BPP, albeit with slightly smaller probability.…”
Section: Analysis Of Prmmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Consider the second probability on the right-hand side. If this were instead under the Poissonized model, then by §3.3 of Friedrich et al (2013), for c 1 chosen large enough, it would be Opn´3q. Then by applying Lemma 1 of that paper, we have that the term is Opn´2 .5 q under the original (not Poissonized) model.…”
Section: Sa2 Path and Spatial Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. Our argument follows the last paragraph of the proof of Lemma 20 of Friedrich et al (2013). Let Q be the cube centered at ρ i with side length c and Q 1 the cube centered at ρ i with side length 2c with the same orientation as Q.…”
Section: Sa2 Path and Spatial Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation