2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29006-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DIAMetAlyzer allows automated false-discovery rate-controlled analysis for data-independent acquisition in metabolomics

Abstract: The extraction of meaningful biological knowledge from high-throughput mass spectrometry data relies on limiting false discoveries to a manageable amount. For targeted approaches in metabolomics a main challenge is the detection of false positive metabolic features in the low signal-to-noise ranges of data-independent acquisition results and their filtering. Another factor is that the creation of assay libraries for data-independent acquisition analysis and the processing of extracted ion chromatograms have no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows the researcher to accept spectrum annotations with a controlled false discovery rate such that they can decide how many incorrect matches they are willing to include in their results. Although a few other methods to control false discovery rates in metabolomics have been introduced (Palmer et al, 2016;Alka et al, 2022), none are currently routinely used. Statistical control of MS/MS spectrum annotations is an important area of research to explore further and advance untargeted metabolomics into a highly scalable quantitative technique, and we anticipate that such tools will become routinely accessible in emerging MS/MS-based spectrum annotation software.…”
Section: Interpreting Spectral Library Searching Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows the researcher to accept spectrum annotations with a controlled false discovery rate such that they can decide how many incorrect matches they are willing to include in their results. Although a few other methods to control false discovery rates in metabolomics have been introduced (Palmer et al, 2016;Alka et al, 2022), none are currently routinely used. Statistical control of MS/MS spectrum annotations is an important area of research to explore further and advance untargeted metabolomics into a highly scalable quantitative technique, and we anticipate that such tools will become routinely accessible in emerging MS/MS-based spectrum annotation software.…”
Section: Interpreting Spectral Library Searching Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For DDA, Passatutto 20 uses re-rooted fragmentation trees, JUMPm 21 adds a small odd numbers of hydrogen atoms, and XY-Meta 22 combines original and randomly selected MS2 peaks. And recently reported for DIA, DIAMetAlyzer 16 , provides an FDR estimation employing Passatutto 20 but it does not support the IM separation. These methods rely on annotated spectra or a sample-specific metabolite database for FDR estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Multiple sub-scores are then calculated per peak-group to assess coelution and identification. Software employing TDX include Skyline 14 , MetDIA 15 , and DIAMetAlyzer 16 . Another tool demonstrated for DIA using a different approach is DecoID 17 , where the MS2 deconvolution is achieved by mixing database spectra to match an experimentally acquired spectrum using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with proteomics, error rate estimation (i.e., false discovery rate) is under development in metabolomics. Recently, DIAMetAlyzer 39 reported an automated false-discovery rate-controlled analysis for data-independent acquisition in metabolomics. More specifically for LC–IM–MS-based lipidomics, MS-DIAL reported the FDR of lipid annotations during RT and CCS matches using their validation set 22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%