Dialysis Mode and Associated Outcomes in Patients With End‐Stage Renal Disease and Atrial Fibrillation: A 14‐Year Nationwide Cohort Study

Abstract

Background Benefits of patients with end‐stage renal disease and atrial fibrillation undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis are unknown. Methods and Results Patients undergoing dialysis were retrieved from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database during 2001 to 2013 and separated into PD or hemodialysis. Primary outcomes were ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). An inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity score was used to reduce the confounding. The risk of outcomes between PD and hemodialysis was compared using Cox proportional hazard model for fatal outcomes or Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard model which considered death a competing risk, respectively. A total of 7916 patients with end‐stage renal disease with atrial fibrillation undergoing PD or hemodialysis during 2001 to 2013 were identified. After exclusion criteria, 363 patients receiving PD and 5302 patients receiving hemodialysis were analyzed. At 1‐year follow‐up, the risk of ICH was significantly lower in the PD group compared with the hemodialysis group (0.2% versus 0.9%; subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17–0.57). At 3‐year follow‐up, the risks of major bleeding and ICH were significantly lower in the PD group compared with the hemodialysis group (major bleeding: 1.8% versus 3.2%; SHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53–0.87; ICH: 0.5% versus 2%; SHR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21–0.48). At 5‐year follow‐up, ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and ICH were significantly lower in the PD group compared with the hemodialysis group (ischemic stroke/systemic embolism: 12.4% versus 17.7%, SHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79–0.96; major bleeding: 2.6% versus 4.1%; SHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64–0.97; ICH: 0.5% versus 2.6%; SHR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.17–0.37). Conclusions In patients with end‐stage renal disease and atrial fibrillation, dialytic modalities by PD or hemodialysis impacted these patients differently. There were overall reduced ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and ICH at 5‐year follow‐up in patients undergoing PD compared with hemodialysis.

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association

“…In a prospective study of 7916 patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, risk for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (subdistribution HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.79–0.96]) and major bleeding (subdistribution HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.64–0.97]) was lower in those undergoing peritoneal dialysis compared with those undergoing hemodialysis. 54…”

2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association

“…In a prospective study of 7916 patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, risk for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (subdistribution HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.79–0.96]) and major bleeding (subdistribution HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.64–0.97]) was lower in those undergoing peritoneal dialysis compared with those undergoing hemodialysis. 58…”