2020
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dialysis facility referral and start of evaluation for kidney transplantation among patients treated with dialysis in the Southeastern United States

Abstract: followed through February 2018 and linked data to referral and evaluation data from nine transplant centers in Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina. Multivariableadjusted competing risk analysis examined each outcome. The median within-facility cumulative percentage of patients referred for kidney transplantation within 1 year of dialysis at the 690 dialysis facilities in Network 6 was 33.7% (interquartile range [IQR]: 25.3%-43.1%). Only 48.3% of referred patients started the transplant evaluation withi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Highly prevalent racial ethnic gender geographic and socioeconomic disparities affect equitable access in kidney transplant. In addition evidence from the United States and Canada has documented substantial variability in referral rates for kidney transplantation among dialysis facilities (from 0%‐100%) and higher rates of wait listing among those facilities with higher referral suggesting there are many end‐stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients who may be eligible for kidney transplantation but have not yet been referred 6,7 . Improving access to the kidney transplant waiting list remains a prominent challenge for the nephrology and transplant communities 8‐10 …”
Section: Viewpointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highly prevalent racial ethnic gender geographic and socioeconomic disparities affect equitable access in kidney transplant. In addition evidence from the United States and Canada has documented substantial variability in referral rates for kidney transplantation among dialysis facilities (from 0%‐100%) and higher rates of wait listing among those facilities with higher referral suggesting there are many end‐stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients who may be eligible for kidney transplantation but have not yet been referred 6,7 . Improving access to the kidney transplant waiting list remains a prominent challenge for the nephrology and transplant communities 8‐10 …”
Section: Viewpointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referral was defined as the date at which the transplant program received a transplant referral form from a dialysis facility or referring provider. The referral data were collected from transplant referral forms and electronic medical records in the transplant programs and linked to the USRDS data as described previously 16,20 . Patients <18 or >80 years of age and those waitlisted, transplanted, or died before referral were excluded (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The referral data were collected from transplant referral forms and electronic medical records in the transplant programs and linked to the USRDS data as described previously. 16,20 Patients <18 or >80 years of age and those waitlisted, transplanted, or died before referral were excluded ( Figure 1). The waitlisting rate metric was calculated as the number of patients who were waitlisted at the transplant program (numerator) divided by the total number of person-years after referral to that program (denominator).…”
Section: Me Thodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations