Dialogue Orientations in Workplace Meetings

Abstract

This study examined conversation preferences in workplace meetings via a cross-sectional survey of working adults ( N = 217). Dialogue orientations from the argumentation literature were employed in conjunction with a typology of meetings proposed by the authors to examine communication and satisfaction in various types of meetings. Results revealed that three dialogue orientations (negotiation, information-giving, and eristic) predicted meeting satisfaction to a moderate degree. In addition, the use of several dialogue orientations differed depending on meeting type and an individual’s supervisory role. We discuss how these results can inform our understanding of dialogue opportunities and constraints during meetings, and recommend ways for improving meetings. These results are discussed in the context of organizational communication, including practical recommendations and theoretical implications.

Promoting Productive Dialogue in the Workplace: The Profound Influence of Civility

“…A literature review on the topic of "Dialogue in the Workplace" explores the importance of effective communication and dialogue within organizational settings [ 46 ] . It delves into various aspects of workplace dialogue, including its impact on employee engagement, productivity, conflict resolution, and overall organizational performance [ 47 ] . Workplace dialogue refers to the open and constructive exchange of ideas, information, and feedback among employees, managers, and other stakeholders within an organization [ 48 ] .…”