1994
DOI: 10.1177/0022487194045003003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dialogical Pedagogy in Teacher Education: Toward an Education for Democracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Shor (1992) cautions teachers about their proclivities for conducting their classes in a teacher-fronted manner and resisting democratic critical dialogue, as this type of dialogue increases their vulnerability to students' criticisms. Therefore, teachers must remain open to students' feedback, as openness is a prerequisite for dialogical education (Fernandez-Balboa & Marshall, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shor (1992) cautions teachers about their proclivities for conducting their classes in a teacher-fronted manner and resisting democratic critical dialogue, as this type of dialogue increases their vulnerability to students' criticisms. Therefore, teachers must remain open to students' feedback, as openness is a prerequisite for dialogical education (Fernandez-Balboa & Marshall, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These responses of teacher educators show the absence of 'dialogical pedagogy' (discussion on program ideas and listening to participants' voices and concerns) and 'negotiated curriculum' (developing curriculum contents through negotiations) which are central aspects of a democratic teacher education program (Fernandez-Balboa and Marshall 1994). Participation of teacher educators should not be confused with teacher educators' involvement in approving a set of program ideas without any considerable input.…”
Section: Teso's Conceptual Orientations: Discrepancies and Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, if at all possible, avoid technocratic (e.g., competitive, elitist, standardized, performance-oriented, bureaucratized, discriminatory, dehumanizing) methods and use those based on caring, compassion, inclusion, cooperation, critical refl ection, etc. (see Fernández-Balboa & Marshall, 1994;Noddings, 2002;Steiner, Krank, McLaren, & Bahruth, 2000;Villegas & Lucas, 2002).…”
Section: Refl Ect On the Ethical And Political Implications Of Your Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this process of awareness raising and struggle, engage in constant and open dialogue (Fernández-Balboa & Marshall, 1994;Freire & Macedo, 1995;Mattuck, 1992;Shor & Freire, 1987), because it is through it that you can (a) become conscious of privilege or oppression; (b) express and clarify thoughts and feelings; (c) practice empathy and solidarity; (d) plan for personal and social transformative actions that promote well-being (Bigelow, 1990;Cook-Sather, 2002;Fernández-Balboa, 2002); and (e) open up alternative voices and discourses, including "languages of critique" and "languages of possibility" (Giroux, 1988): While using the language of critique to bring to the fore the social and historical particularities that shape the dominant forms that give (or deny) meaning to PE, sport, and peopleʼs lives, 4 remember also to balance this language with a "language of possibility"-one that enables alternative forms of self and social empowerment (Giroux, 1988). 5…”
Section: Open Up Alternative Voices and Discourses Through Dialoguementioning
confidence: 99%