1958
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1958.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diallel cross in plant breeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
53
0
6

Year Published

1985
1985
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
53
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…High heterosis might be obtained with parents of diverse origin in the presence of adequate favorable environment for expression of heterosis and in the absence of mutual cancellation of components of heterosis. Generally parents with high order of expression of the characters, when combined, produced hybrids with high expression (Gilbert, 1958).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High heterosis might be obtained with parents of diverse origin in the presence of adequate favorable environment for expression of heterosis and in the absence of mutual cancellation of components of heterosis. Generally parents with high order of expression of the characters, when combined, produced hybrids with high expression (Gilbert, 1958).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above treatment of environmental variation, similar to Hayman's (1954), is useful for diallel experiments arranged in balanced com- One of these assumptions, namely the one which states that genes are independently distributed across the parents, has been most criticised (Gilbert, 1958;Feyt, 1976;and Baker, 1978). In its simplest formulation, this assumption may be written as in (1.1), but having n loci we need at least 2' parents to obtain a non-trivial theoretical situation in which (1.1) is satisfied (Feyt, 1976).…”
Section: Environmental Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology, presented in a series of papers (Jinks and Hayman, 1953;Hayman, 1954; and Jinks, 1954), has been reviewed by several authors (Gilbert, 1958;Nassar, 1965;Feyt, 1976;Baker, 1978) who criticised the validity of its assumptions and analysed the consequences of their failure. These assumptions are: (a) diploid segregation, (b) no difference between reciprocal crosses, (c) no non-allelic interaction, (d) no multiple allelism, (e) homozygous parents and (f) genes independently distributed across the parents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shimna and Ravikesavan (2008) advised that the per se performance of hybrids appeared to be a useful index in judging them. Gilbert (1958) suggested that parents with good per se performance would result in good hybrids. 27 g), VS-9-S11-1 x KC3 (188.93 g), African I-2 x TCH 1705-250 (178.80 g), F-2617 x TCH 1608 (170.07 g) and VS-9-S11-1 x TCH 1608 (168.33 g).…”
Section: Mean Performancementioning
confidence: 99%