2009
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dialects in pygmy marmosets? Population variation in call structure

Abstract: Population variation in primate vocal structure has been rarely observed. Here, we report significant population differences in the structure of two vocalizations in wild pygmy marmosets (Trills and J calls). We studied 14 groups of pygmy marmosets Callithrix (Cebuella) pygmaea pygmaea from five populations in northeastern Ecuador. We analyzed the acoustic structure of Trills and J calls recorded from two adult animals in each group through focal samples. Although individuals and groups within a population dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
37
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, wild pygmy marmosets ( Cebuella pygmaea , de la Torre & Snowdon, 2009) have population specific vocal dialects that cannot be explained by habitat acoustics or genetic variation and thus are suggestive of innovations that can spread through a population. Recent research suggests that marmosets can learn vocalizations and turn-taking roles through parental influence providing additional evidence of social learning (Chow, Mitchell & Miller, 2012; Takahashi, Fenley, Teramoto, Narayanan, Borjon, Holmes, Ghazanfar, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, wild pygmy marmosets ( Cebuella pygmaea , de la Torre & Snowdon, 2009) have population specific vocal dialects that cannot be explained by habitat acoustics or genetic variation and thus are suggestive of innovations that can spread through a population. Recent research suggests that marmosets can learn vocalizations and turn-taking roles through parental influence providing additional evidence of social learning (Chow, Mitchell & Miller, 2012; Takahashi, Fenley, Teramoto, Narayanan, Borjon, Holmes, Ghazanfar, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontogenetic vocal production learning, however, is but one function of the primate vocal-motor system. Evidence of learning and behavioral control is available for many other aspects of this system (Elowson and Snowdon, 1994; Mitani and Gros-Louis, 1998; Suguira, 1998; Snowdon and Elowsen, 1999; Miller et al, 2003; Egnor et al, 2006, 2007; Miller and Wang, 2006; De la Torre and Snowdon, 2009). Even if the basic acoustic structure of a call is innately determined, the vocal behaviors themselves are not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, neurophysiological evidence shows a cortical mechanism to mediate auditory feedback for vocal control (Eliades and Wang, 2008). Evidence of vocal learning is also available in the form of dialects and vocal convergence (Elowson and Snowdon, 1994; Snowdon and Elowsen, 1999; De la Torre and Snowdon, 2009), though ontogenetic learning of call structure remains limited. The growing body of behavioral data suggest a more sophisticated system of vocal production for primates than was previously thought, providing a more substantive empirical basis for cortical control of vocal production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dialects) have been widely demonstrated [10], but only rarely shown in mammals, such as prairie dogs (Cynomys gunnisoni ) [11], chipmunks (Eutamias spp.) [12], marmosets (Cebuella pygmaea) [13] and bats (Phyllostomus discolor) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%