1985
DOI: 10.2307/377350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dialectics of Coherence: Toward An Integrative Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
11

Year Published

1986
1986
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, we can expect the model to account for both the regularities in text structures which correspond with similar texts doing similar mediational work, as well as quite specific and arbitrary text structures associated with any given deliberative activity as it unfolds in a social context. This modeling approach comes very close to a process described by Phelps [14] who articulated an approach to structural analysis drawing on and responding to work by Faigley & Witte [15] and Van de Kopple [16] in composition studies, as well as Halliday & Hassan [17] and Van Dijk [18] in linguistics to make sense of apparently competing interests in writing studies, generally, in writing as product vs. writing as process. Phelps [14] sees texts as objects with histories, requiring us to study them "in process" if we are to understand how they shape the experiences of a reader.…”
Section: Challenge 1: Creating Text Structure Models Based On Delibermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this way, we can expect the model to account for both the regularities in text structures which correspond with similar texts doing similar mediational work, as well as quite specific and arbitrary text structures associated with any given deliberative activity as it unfolds in a social context. This modeling approach comes very close to a process described by Phelps [14] who articulated an approach to structural analysis drawing on and responding to work by Faigley & Witte [15] and Van de Kopple [16] in composition studies, as well as Halliday & Hassan [17] and Van Dijk [18] in linguistics to make sense of apparently competing interests in writing studies, generally, in writing as product vs. writing as process. Phelps [14] sees texts as objects with histories, requiring us to study them "in process" if we are to understand how they shape the experiences of a reader.…”
Section: Challenge 1: Creating Text Structure Models Based On Delibermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To say that some telling evaluations are due to their 'timing' is to adopt a temporal or linear perspective on the reading process. As argued by Phelps (1985), this temporal or 'flow' perspective, in which reading is viewed äs on-line activity (i.e. äs energy), can be set against a spatial or 'design' perspective, in which reading is contemplated after the event (i.e.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Daar is bevind dat koherensie inklusief en relatief is: dit kan in terme van 'n reeks verbandhoudende paradokse beskryf word (vgl. Phelps, 1985;Van Schalkwyk, 1998:69-84;Van Schalkwyk & Carstens, 2000). Die paradoksaliteit van koherensie laat ruimte vir (skynbaar) onsamehangende tekste en derhalwe voldoen hierdie tipe tekste tog aan koherensie as vernaamste beginsel van tekstualiteit.…”
Section: Koherensie En Ruimteunclassified