Handbook of Critical International Relations 2020
DOI: 10.4337/9781788112895.00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dialectics in critical international relations theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it seems the face of Muhammed represents a polarity between extremist conceptions of the “people” and the “ ummah ”, their mutuality becomes visible when the image of the Prophet is considered as a metaphor. Here, the fine distinction is that polarities are connected beyond their opposition; subject A and B are connected through C rather than A≠B (see also Brincat and de Groot Heupner 2020). Similar to the logic of metaphors, subject A and B are dependent on a third element that functions to substitute the meaning of A and B.…”
Section: The “Face” Of Muhammedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it seems the face of Muhammed represents a polarity between extremist conceptions of the “people” and the “ ummah ”, their mutuality becomes visible when the image of the Prophet is considered as a metaphor. Here, the fine distinction is that polarities are connected beyond their opposition; subject A and B are connected through C rather than A≠B (see also Brincat and de Groot Heupner 2020). Similar to the logic of metaphors, subject A and B are dependent on a third element that functions to substitute the meaning of A and B.…”
Section: The “Face” Of Muhammedmentioning
confidence: 99%