1997
DOI: 10.1515/9780271075891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dialectical Readings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This contrast-rooted dialectical dynamic permeates developmental change processes in multiple domains, including not only individual personality (e.g., Linehan, 1993), interpersonal relationships (e.g., Baxter & Montgomery, 1998), and society (e.g., Buss, 1979), but also ideas themselves (cf. Dunning, 1997; Hanna, 1994). Indeed, Rychlak's (1976b) passionate call for appreciating the singular relevance and heuristic power of dialectical thinking for the social and human sciences warrants reiteration.…”
Section: Reconciling Plurality and Unity: Tasks In Developing A Unify...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This contrast-rooted dialectical dynamic permeates developmental change processes in multiple domains, including not only individual personality (e.g., Linehan, 1993), interpersonal relationships (e.g., Baxter & Montgomery, 1998), and society (e.g., Buss, 1979), but also ideas themselves (cf. Dunning, 1997; Hanna, 1994). Indeed, Rychlak's (1976b) passionate call for appreciating the singular relevance and heuristic power of dialectical thinking for the social and human sciences warrants reiteration.…”
Section: Reconciling Plurality and Unity: Tasks In Developing A Unify...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While multiple meanings have come to define a dialectic, Rychlak (1976b) crystallized that the “core meaning” (p. 14) is that of bipolarity, wherein two elements stand in direct and dynamic opposition or contradiction to one another. Prototypically embodied in Hegel's classic “thesis–antithesis” duality, others have depicted this configuration in terms of “binary oppositions” (Dunning, 1997, p. 4), “internal opposing forces” (Linehan, 1993, p. 32), and “unified opposites” (Baxter & Montgomery, 1998, p. 4). Downing (2000), contributing an important elaboration that further underpins dialecticism's direct pertinence to bridging theory, distinguished between dialectic as an ontology and as a method.…”
Section: Reconciling Plurality and Unity: Tasks In Developing A Unify...mentioning
confidence: 99%