2020
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10090632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostics of Melanocytic Skin Tumours by a Combination of Ultrasonic, Dermatoscopic and Spectrophotometric Image Parameters

Abstract: Dermatoscopy, high-frequency ultrasonography (HFUS) and spectrophotometry are promising quantitative imaging techniques for the investigation and diagnostics of cutaneous melanocytic tumors. In this paper, we propose the hybrid technique and automatic prognostic models by combining the quantitative image parameters of ultrasonic B-scan images, dermatoscopic and spectrophotometric images (melanin, blood and collagen) to increase accuracy in the diagnostics of cutaneous melanoma. The extracted sets of various qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore analyzed the entire panel of 27 cytokines/chemokines with the SVM machine learning algorithm, to investigate simultaneously all molecules as predictors of melanoma state. In other studies, SVM effectively discriminated melanoma on the basis of dermoscopic images [44], ultrasonic and spectrophotometric images [45], BRAF status [46], or dermo-fluorescence spectra [47], with a reported accuracy up to 90%. SVM was previously used for prognostic purposes in melanoma patients [48] but, to our knowledge, the present study is the first applying the SVM analysis to cytokine/chemokine-expression values to discriminate melanoma from controls, both in serum and in tissue, in a large group of controls and patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We therefore analyzed the entire panel of 27 cytokines/chemokines with the SVM machine learning algorithm, to investigate simultaneously all molecules as predictors of melanoma state. In other studies, SVM effectively discriminated melanoma on the basis of dermoscopic images [44], ultrasonic and spectrophotometric images [45], BRAF status [46], or dermo-fluorescence spectra [47], with a reported accuracy up to 90%. SVM was previously used for prognostic purposes in melanoma patients [48] but, to our knowledge, the present study is the first applying the SVM analysis to cytokine/chemokine-expression values to discriminate melanoma from controls, both in serum and in tissue, in a large group of controls and patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Firstly, the combination of optical and ultrasound information has already been shown to increase the diagnostic accuracy of skin tumours. 14 Similarly, since ultrasound measures of skin inflammation have been shown to correlate well with the semi-quantitatively observed level of skin inflammation, 22,12,41 even to the extent of detecting subclinical inflammation, 11 the combined use of optical and ultrasound information may serve to provide better choices for personalized treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Ultrasound imaging has the potential to play an important role in improving the detection, treatment planning and follow-up of the above-mentioned skin diseases with significant prevalence. [8][9][10][11][12][13] Combining the ultrasound information with optical imaging can further strengthen diagnostic accuracy, 14 since ultrasound information alone may not be enough for the diagnosis of skin diseases such as skin cancer. 15 1.2.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To shorten the time of postprocessing (Tiwari et al, 2020), we are proposing the combined set of quantitative parameters (S h , S n , P ) extracted from the diagnostic images and perfusion dynamic curves to be used for the classification, instead of the whole CEUS images. The proposed list of quantitative parameters covers entropy, energy, contrast, correlation, energy from grayscale cooccurrence matrix, homogeneity, mean, standard deviation, RMS, variance, smoothness, kurtosis and skewness (Tiwari et al, 2020). Such parameters were successfully applied in our previous work for detection of skin cancer by analysing ultrasonic images (Tiwari et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Algorithm For Analysis Of Ceus Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed list of quantitative parameters covers entropy, energy, contrast, correlation, energy from grayscale cooccurrence matrix, homogeneity, mean, standard deviation, RMS, variance, smoothness, kurtosis and skewness (Tiwari et al, 2020). Such parameters were successfully applied in our previous work for detection of skin cancer by analysing ultrasonic images (Tiwari et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Algorithm For Analysis Of Ceus Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%