2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2015.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostics in a simple correspondence analysis model: An approach based on Cook’s distance for log-linear models

Abstract: a b s t r a c tDiagnostics have not received much attention in the literature of simple correspondence analysis models. Since Cook's distance was defined to identify influential observations of the linear regression model, it has been extended to different models, in particular to loglinear models. In this paper we provide the asymptotic distribution of Cook's distance of any kind of log-linear models and also a method for diagnostics, based on it. By using Goodman's RC (K ) model as a log-linear model to appr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, Figure S6a diagnosed a random distribution without any patterns or trends, while the actual and predicted data in Figure S6b had high-compatibility because these points were randomly scattered along the 45-degree line. Also, Cook's distance in Figure S7a was used to record any changes made by the quadratic model in the case of deleting or omitting any data point [52]. Although the Cook's distance of two points was found to be larger than 1.0, which may lead to a lack of their accuracy, the others (18 data points) were lower than 1.0, meaning that omitting one of them is highly unlikely to vary the estimate of the regression coefficients [53].…”
Section: Optimization Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, Figure S6a diagnosed a random distribution without any patterns or trends, while the actual and predicted data in Figure S6b had high-compatibility because these points were randomly scattered along the 45-degree line. Also, Cook's distance in Figure S7a was used to record any changes made by the quadratic model in the case of deleting or omitting any data point [52]. Although the Cook's distance of two points was found to be larger than 1.0, which may lead to a lack of their accuracy, the others (18 data points) were lower than 1.0, meaning that omitting one of them is highly unlikely to vary the estimate of the regression coefficients [53].…”
Section: Optimization Studymentioning
confidence: 99%