2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2011.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnóstico y tratamiento del trastorno por déficit de atención/hiperactividad: diferencias entre entrevista clínica y prueba psicométrica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The next applied objective of this research is to make a clinical diagnosis of subjects with no normative results in response times regarding their age group, in order to validate this detection methodology. We point out that these measurements cannot replace a clinical assessment, but it could help to make the correct diagnosis, mainly in a specially difficult field as ADHD [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The next applied objective of this research is to make a clinical diagnosis of subjects with no normative results in response times regarding their age group, in order to validate this detection methodology. We point out that these measurements cannot replace a clinical assessment, but it could help to make the correct diagnosis, mainly in a specially difficult field as ADHD [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its diagnosis is confirmed in the basis of psychiatric interviews received by the children, their parents, and their teachers. However, there is usually a backlog between the appearance of symptoms and the diagnosis and beginning of the treatment [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%