2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2015.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic yield of targeted next generation sequencing in various cancer types: An information-theoretic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our population, we identified a higher percentage of KRAS mutations (37.9% vs 28% and 26%) and fewer EGFR mutations (11.1% vs 14% and 20%) than reported by Hageman et al and Dogan et al, respectively [9] , [10] . This may be due to different prevalence of smoking and ethnicity in the different sample sets or selection bias of the various populations or testing methods (for instance, we tested multiple samples from the same patient in several instances).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…In our population, we identified a higher percentage of KRAS mutations (37.9% vs 28% and 26%) and fewer EGFR mutations (11.1% vs 14% and 20%) than reported by Hageman et al and Dogan et al, respectively [9] , [10] . This may be due to different prevalence of smoking and ethnicity in the different sample sets or selection bias of the various populations or testing methods (for instance, we tested multiple samples from the same patient in several instances).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…In a study to determine if results from NGS are useful for detecting mutations in tumor tissues, Hagemann et al analyzed the mutations revealed from NGS from the five most common cancer types and calculated a Shannon entropy level for each tumor type to determine if NGS revealed new information. High levels of Shannon entropy indicate analytic utility, while low levels indicate that a variable provides no new or useful information [49]. In this study, Shannon entropy levels for these cancer types from highest to lowest were colorectal cancer, high grade glioma, non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, and sarcomas/soft tissue tumors [49].…”
Section: Next-generation Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…High levels of Shannon entropy indicate analytic utility, while low levels indicate that a variable provides no new or useful information [49]. In this study, Shannon entropy levels for these cancer types from highest to lowest were colorectal cancer, high grade glioma, non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, and sarcomas/soft tissue tumors [49]. These results suggest that for some major cancer types, including lung cancer, NGS has analytic utility and could provide useful information in cancer diagnosis without being redundant.…”
Section: Next-generation Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hagemann et al designed an experiment to verify the results from NGS analysis based on in situ tissue. 53 Results suggested that NGS analysis provides reliable reference information for NSCLC diagnosis. In the field of lung cancer study, NGS has the advantage of detecting unknown mutated sites, while ddPCR focuses on individual known mutated sites.…”
Section: Next-generation Sequencing Detection For Lung Cancer Diagnosmentioning
confidence: 96%