2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic yield of hair and urine toxicology testing in potential child abuse cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 210 MA-exposed infants in the IDEAL study, 71% were identified by maternal self-report compared to 3.8% by meconium alone [91]. Other matrixes, including newborn hair, are increasingly used in forensic or chain of custody settings but these tests may not be widely available or accessible [92].…”
Section: Drug Screening and Testing To Diagnose Prenatal Ma Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 210 MA-exposed infants in the IDEAL study, 71% were identified by maternal self-report compared to 3.8% by meconium alone [91]. Other matrixes, including newborn hair, are increasingly used in forensic or chain of custody settings but these tests may not be widely available or accessible [92].…”
Section: Drug Screening and Testing To Diagnose Prenatal Ma Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hair toxicology samples were analyzed by United States Drug Testing Laboratory (Des Plaines, Illinois, USA) using the Childguard ® test for amphetamines (including amphetamine and methamphetamine), cocaine, opiates, phencyclidine, and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) [ 9 ]. Collection of hair specimens followed chain of custody procedure with documentation of specimen matrix and location, indication for testing, test panel, and patient identification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 However, documented cases have demonstrated that acute intoxication by drugs in children is frequently the first evidence of a repeated exposure to those drugs. 5 Based on this experience, hair analysis has become the "gold standard" in cases of suspected exposure to drugs in children because it provides a broader window of detection than urine and can be easily collected under supervision. 2 Nevertheless, peculiarities of young children's hair must be taken into account in order to achieve an accurate interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%