2010
DOI: 10.1159/000322071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Impact of Capsule Endoscopy in Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding during Routine Clinical Practice: A Single-Center Experience

Abstract: Objective: This study assessed the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy (CE) and its impact on patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Subjects and Methods: Between May 2007 and May 2009, 63 patients with OGIB (overt bleeding: 25, and occult blood loss with chronic ferropenic anemia: 38) and normal upper and lower endoscopy were studied by CE. Demographic characteristics, prior diagnostic tests, CE findings, therapeutic interventions, medical treatment and clinical outcomes following CE were e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was reported that positive CE findings led to a specific therapy that resolved the underlying disease or improved the clinical condition in 71.4% of OGIB patients after a mean follow-up time of 11.8 months [13]. Lai et al [14] suggested that the re-bleeding rate in OGIB patients with negative CE findings was significantly lower than that in patients with positive CE findings (5.6 vs. 48.4%, respectively; p = 0.03).…”
Section: Utility Of Ce In Ogibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that positive CE findings led to a specific therapy that resolved the underlying disease or improved the clinical condition in 71.4% of OGIB patients after a mean follow-up time of 11.8 months [13]. Lai et al [14] suggested that the re-bleeding rate in OGIB patients with negative CE findings was significantly lower than that in patients with positive CE findings (5.6 vs. 48.4%, respectively; p = 0.03).…”
Section: Utility Of Ce In Ogibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Seven of them were prospective 15,20,21,28,[33][34][35] and 17 were retrospective studies. [12][13][14][16][17][18][19][22][23][24][25][26][27][29][30][31][32] Only 2 were multicenter studies. 12,13 In all but 4 studies (in 3, not reported 18,23,27 and 1 study 31 with EndoCapsule [Olympus, Tokyo, Japan]), SBCE explorations were performed with capsule endoscopes from Given Imaging Ltd (Yoqneam, Israel).…”
Section: Descriptive Assessment and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four publications focused exclusively on IDA patients (subset 1), 21,30,33,35 whereas in the remaining 20 articles, patients with IDA represented only a subgroup of a larger patient cohort undergoing SBCE (subset 2). [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]31,32,34 The QUADAS evaluation of the included studies is shown in Table 2. Nine QUADAS items (items 3-11) were not relevant and thus not assessed.…”
Section: Descriptive Assessment and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Angiodysplasias, tumours, Crohn’s disease, intestinal tuberculosis and hookworm infestation were predominant aetiologies. Katsinelos et al [11] assessed the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy in 63 patients with obscure GI bleeding and normal upper and lower endoscopy. The overall diagnostic yield was 44.44% of patients and included findings of angiectasia in 11 patients, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs enteropathy in 6 patients, celiac disease in 3 patients, tumours in 2 patients and a variety of other diagnoses ranging from varices to ulcers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%