1950
DOI: 10.1037/h0058479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic value of the Wechsler Memory Scale with selected groups of institutionalized patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1954
1954
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In brief, normal cognitive performance levels of all participants was ascertained by psychiatric examination and neuropsychological testing including an initial screen for cognitive impairment [Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE); Folstein et al, 1975], followed by specific assessment of cognitive subdomains: Language skills were tested by applying the short version of the Boston Naming Test (BNT) from the CERAD-Plus testbattery (Nicholas et al, 1988; Thalmann et al, 1997); working memory performance was assessed by measuring memory span [digits forward and backward for short term memory assessment from the Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised (WMS-R) (Howard, 1950; Härting et al, 2000)]; cognitive flexibility was measured as an indicator of executive functioning [ratio of Trail Making Test A and B (Reitan, 1958; Tombaugh, 2004)]; memory performance was tested by applying the Verbal Learning and Memory Test (VLMT, immediate, delayed and supported recall) (Helmstaedter and Durwen, 1990; Helmstaedter, 2001). The VLMT is a modified german version of the auditory VLMT (Lezak, 1983; Müller et al, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, normal cognitive performance levels of all participants was ascertained by psychiatric examination and neuropsychological testing including an initial screen for cognitive impairment [Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE); Folstein et al, 1975], followed by specific assessment of cognitive subdomains: Language skills were tested by applying the short version of the Boston Naming Test (BNT) from the CERAD-Plus testbattery (Nicholas et al, 1988; Thalmann et al, 1997); working memory performance was assessed by measuring memory span [digits forward and backward for short term memory assessment from the Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised (WMS-R) (Howard, 1950; Härting et al, 2000)]; cognitive flexibility was measured as an indicator of executive functioning [ratio of Trail Making Test A and B (Reitan, 1958; Tombaugh, 2004)]; memory performance was tested by applying the Verbal Learning and Memory Test (VLMT, immediate, delayed and supported recall) (Helmstaedter and Durwen, 1990; Helmstaedter, 2001). The VLMT is a modified german version of the auditory VLMT (Lezak, 1983; Müller et al, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prigatano fasel & Pruyser, 1955) ; (8) patients with hemispherectomy (Mensh, Schu-artz. llatarazzo, & Matarazzo, 1952) ; (9) comniissurotomy (Zaidel & Sperry, 1974) ; (10) prefrontal lobotomy (Struckett, 1953) ; (1 1) temporal lobectomy (Milner, 1968) ; (12) thalamotony (Orchinik, 1960) ; (13) postthalamotony (Shapiro, Sadowsky, Henderson, & Van Buren, 1973) ; plus (14) various groups of "organic" psychotics (Howard, 1950) and (15) "functional" psychotic and neurotic patients (Cohen, 1950).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a discrepancy between the Full Scale IQ and the MQ does exist, under what conditions might that discrepancy reflect a true memory deficit (MacCara, 1953)? Is the test helpful in separating "organic" from "psychiatric" patients (e.g., Cohen, 1950;Howard, 1950)? Are some of the new scoring methods (e.g., Bachrach & Mintz, 1974;Kljaji6, 1975;Russell, 1975) useful in improving the discriminative power of the test in identifying patients with identifiable brain dysfunction?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been few published studies of the Wechsler Memory Scale. The earlier investigations attempted to discriminate between differently labelled psychiatric groups, such as schizophrenics and organic brain syndromes, on the basis of total scores on the Scale (Cohen, 1950;Howard, 1950 and1954;Parker, 1957). Given the 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%