2021
DOI: 10.14712/18059694.2021.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Value of Narrow Band Imaging in Visualization of Pathological Lesions in Larynx and Hypopharynx

Abstract: Introduction: Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) is an endoscopic optical imaging enhancement technology that improves the contrast of mucosal surface texture and enhances visualization of mucosal and submucosal vasculature. Due to its properties, it can visualize suspected malignant or precancerous lesions earlier than conventional white light endoscopy. The aim of this study was to analyze the benefit of NBI in visualization of precancerous and malignant lesions in preoperative and intraoperative diagnostics and corr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the early meta-analysis of Zhou et al from 2018 [ 32 ] summarizing eight studies in the field of laryngeal lesions, the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of malignant lesions in NBI was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.885–0.931) and 0.915 (95% CI: 0.893–0.934), respectively. Later studies supported only the evidence with the values of sensitivity and specificity ranging from 0.84 to 0.985 and from 0.889 to, 0.985, respectively [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ]. It must be emphasized that in that research, the parameters of diagnostic accuracy were obtained based on evaluation by at least two specialists experienced with the method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the early meta-analysis of Zhou et al from 2018 [ 32 ] summarizing eight studies in the field of laryngeal lesions, the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of malignant lesions in NBI was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.885–0.931) and 0.915 (95% CI: 0.893–0.934), respectively. Later studies supported only the evidence with the values of sensitivity and specificity ranging from 0.84 to 0.985 and from 0.889 to, 0.985, respectively [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ]. It must be emphasized that in that research, the parameters of diagnostic accuracy were obtained based on evaluation by at least two specialists experienced with the method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%